| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 39.2% | Holder distribution | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 24619 | Token contract | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 18 Apr 2024 — 873 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x54a79a…cbb989 |
| Deployed by | 0xb50593…94e155 |
| Current owner | 0xcda8e3…2f4c92 |
| Holders | 24,619 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x8f6449…ba449c | 11.15% |
| #2 | 0x744dbc…38da24 | 7.31% |
| #3 | 0xc2f315…a2d412 | 3.23% |
| #4 | 0x1f9034…ac3909 | 3.05% |
| #5 | 0xda8b6e…bc18bc | 2.67% |
This automated check looked at ZRO's contract mechanics on Ethereum and scored 16 out of 18. In practical terms, a transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and buy and sell tax are both set at 0%, so nothing in the code was detected that would block a holder from moving or liquidating their tokens. No admin mint function was found, meaning the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so the owner does not appear able to freeze transfers. No blacklist function was found, meaning the owner does not appear able to block specific addresses from trading. The contract is not upgradeable through a proxy, so the underlying logic cannot be swapped out after the fact by the deployer. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which means the code behind the token is publicly readable rather than hidden. Two points stood out as worth attention rather than as red flags in themselves: the top 10 holders together control 39.2% of supply, which is a meaningful concentration that could affect how the market moves if those holders act together, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool retains the ability to withdraw it.
None of this tells you who is behind LayerZero, what their track record is, how the token's supply is scheduled to unlock over time, whether the project has any legal or regulatory exposure, or what the team's intentions are. This check only reads what the smart contract itself allows or disallows on the date of the scan; it says nothing about the people, the roadmap, or the broader business behind the token, and it does not involve any human review.
Before putting money in, it would be worth looking at who currently holds the concentrated top-10 positions and whether any are known exchange or team wallets, checking the project's own documentation for vesting and unlock schedules, confirming who controls the liquidity pool and under what terms, and reviewing independent commentary or audits from sources outside this automated check. None of the above should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell, and no findings here should be taken as a guarantee of safety.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.