| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 9.4% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 35 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x2d1c15…3163a1 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 35 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x2d1c15…3163a1 | 6.13% |
| #2 | 0x8ebb2b…17cd29 | 1.89% |
| #3 · contract | 0x0cc933…f39be0 | 1.17% |
| #4 | 0x9d2f41…646c1f | 0.09% |
| #5 | 0x462cb3…c29495 | 0.03% |
This automated check looked at ALPHA's contract code and on-chain data on the date of the scan, and none of the mechanisms commonly used to trap or drain holders were detected. A simulated transfer showed the token can be sold, and both buy and sell tax are set to 0%. No admin minting function was found, meaning the owner does not appear able to create new tokens and dilute holders at will. Transfers are not pausable, so the contract does not currently give the owner a switch to freeze trading. There is no address blacklist function present, so holders cannot be individually blocked from transacting based on what's in the code today. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, which matters because upgradeable contracts can have their entire logic swapped out after launch, potentially introducing new restrictions later; that risk is not present here. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code is publicly readable rather than hidden. Two points are worth sitting with: top-10 wallets hold 9.4% of supply, which is on the lower end and suggests reduced concentration risk, and liquidity is NOT locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool tokens could remove liquidity from the trading pair at any time, which can sharply affect your ability to sell at a reasonable price even though the token itself isn't a honeypot.
It's worth being clear about what this check cannot tell you. It reads contract mechanics and holder data only — it says nothing about who is behind Alpha Dao, whether the team is doxxed or anonymous, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a working product, or whether any marketing claims hold up. Tokenomics, legal structure, and the intentions of whoever deployed and controls the contract fall entirely outside what an automated scan can assess.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking up who holds the liquidity pool tokens and whether that wallet has a history of pulling liquidity elsewhere, checking whether the project has any public team information or social presence you can independently verify, looking at the holder list for wallets that look linked or newly funded from the same source, and reading the actual contract functions yourself or via the explorer's "read contract" tab if you want to confirm these findings firsthand. None of this guarantees an outcome either way — it's simply the next layer of homework beyond what an automated contract scan can cover.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.