| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Proxy contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 46% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 18168 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x763ac4…d87882 |
| Current code | 0x6ed767…767aec |
| Holders | 18,168 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xc7e8b3…260b45 | 11.71% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 6.58% |
| #3 | 0xca31c9…c39c59 | 6.10% |
| #4 | 0x1157a2…8f4101 | 5.11% |
| #5 · contract | 0x58be00…ee39a1 | 3.84% |
This automated check scanned SYRUP's contract code on Ethereum and found a few mechanics worth understanding before you act on them. The contract's admin mint function is enabled, which means whoever controls the owner address can create new tokens at will — this can dilute the value of existing holdings without a holder's consent. The contract also uses an upgradeable proxy, meaning the logic governing how the token behaves can be swapped out after the fact; this doesn't itself cause harm, but it means the rules you're relying on today aren't necessarily permanent. Liquidity in the main trading pool is not locked, though it's spread across 56 separate providers rather than concentrated in one wallet, which is a different risk profile than a single party being able to pull liquidity unilaterally. On the more reassuring side, the check found the token sellable in simulation, with no buy or sell tax detected, no pausable transfer function found, and no address blacklist function found as of the date of this check — meaning no indication was found that the owner can freeze transfers or block specific wallets from trading. Source code is verified on the block explorer, and top-10 wallets hold 46.4% of supply, a concentration level that increases sensitivity to large holder movements.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract code and on-chain data only — it has no way to assess who the team behind SYRUP is, whether their stated plans match reality, how tokenomics are structured beyond raw mint and tax mechanics, or whether any legal entity stands behind the project. A clean technical reading says nothing about intent, roadmap credibility, or whether the admin mint capability will ever be used. No human reviewed this contract; the result comes entirely from automated analysis of what the code permits, not what anyone plans to do with it.
Before putting money into SYRUP, it's worth looking into who controls the owner and proxy admin addresses and whether those are held by a multisig or a single key, checking whether there's any public commitment or timelock around use of the mint function, reviewing the project's own documentation and team disclosures, and looking at how the top holders acquired their positions and whether any are exchange or liquidity-pool addresses rather than individual investors. Cross-referencing this technical snapshot with independent research into the people and organisation behind the token is a separate step this check cannot substitute for.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.