| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Implementation code | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Implementation code | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Implementation code | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Balances | Changeable — whoever controls the contract can take tokens from any wallet | Implementation code | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Proxy contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 96% | Holder distribution | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 7146 | Token contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x9458da…875d35 |
| Current code | 0xf4ccc8…0ff05b |
| Holders | 7,146 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xbeef0c…5ddb2f | 69.22% |
| #2 | 0x0529ea…c553b7 | 7.57% |
| #3 · contract | 0x100ae0…3829ba | 5.96% |
| #4 | 0x804b68…aa0c26 | 4.16% |
| #5 · contract | 0xbbbbbb…eeffcb | 3.32% |
This automated check scored EURCV 5 out of 18 on contract mechanics, and each finding translates into a specific capability the contract owner holds over tokens already in a buyer's wallet. Admin mint being enabled means the owner can create new tokens at will, which can dilute existing holders. Transfers being pausable means the owner can freeze all movement of the token network-wide, stopping anyone from sending or selling. Blacklisting support means individual addresses can be blocked from transacting entirely. The ability to change balances directly is the most significant finding here: it means whoever controls the contract can alter or remove tokens from any wallet without that holder's consent. The contract is upgradeable, so the logic behind all of this can be replaced after the fact, meaning today's behaviour is not necessarily tomorrow's. No honeypot behaviour was detected in this check — the simulation found the token sellable with 0% buy and sell tax — and the source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows this kind of review to happen at all. However, liquidity is not locked, and the top 10 holders control 96.2% of supply, both of which are concentration and exit-risk indicators independent of the contract code itself.
It's worth being clear about what this check is and isn't. It reads the contract's mechanical permissions — what the code technically allows the owner or deployer to do — on the date it was run. It does not assess who the team is, whether their stated intentions match the code, the token's broader economic design, any legal or regulatory status, or whether this is an officially sanctioned, regulated issuance (as the EURCV name and euro-stablecoin framing might suggest). Automated checks like this one cannot verify identity, legal backing, or custodial arrangements behind a token.
Before putting money into this or any token with these characteristics, it's worth independently verifying who actually controls the admin keys and whether that control sits with a named, regulated entity rather than an anonymous wallet. Checking whether the contract has a timelock or multisig governing upgrades and mint functions is also useful, since that affects how quickly changes could be made. Looking at the liquidity pool directly — its size, lock status, and who holds the LP tokens — and reviewing the distribution behind that 96.2% concentration figure to see whether it reflects custodial or exchange wallets rather than individual holders would add useful context this check does not provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.