| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 50.4% | Holder distribution | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 64204 | Token contract | 10 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x909d05…f347ec |
| Current owner | 0xf73a12…9a3249 |
| Holders | 64,204 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x3e40d7…6e9c8c | 12.15% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 6.08% |
| #3 · contract | 0x945755…72168b | 5.00% |
| #4 · contract | 0x695c38…917740 | 5.00% |
| #5 · contract | 0xa2dfc4…84fbcd | 4.58% |
This automated check scored LDO 11 out of 18 on contract mechanics alone, and a few of the findings are worth translating into plain terms. "Transfers can be paused by the owner" means that whoever holds the contract's admin permissions has the technical ability to freeze trading for all holders at any time, for any reason, without needing holder consent. "Owner can change balances directly" means the contract includes a function that could alter a wallet's token balance without that wallet initiating a transfer. Neither of these means such an action has happened or is planned — only that the code allows for it. On the positive side, no minting function was detected (so the owner cannot currently create new tokens out of thin air), there's no blacklist function found, the token simulated as sellable with 0% buy and sell tax, and the contract source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning anyone can read what it actually does rather than trusting a black box. Holder concentration is moderate-to-high, with the top 10 wallets controlling just over half the supply — common for tokens with large treasury, foundation, or staking-related holdings, but worth noting since large holders can move markets if they sell.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It only reads contract mechanics as they exist on-chain today — it says nothing about who controls the admin keys, whether those keys sit with a multisig or DAO governance process, the team's track record, the token's broader economic design, vesting schedules, treasury management, or any legal or regulatory standing. A contract can score well on mechanics and still carry risk from how it's governed or who benefits from those admin powers, and vice versa. This check does not assess intent, and it cannot tell you whether current permissions will be used responsibly, renounced, or expanded.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking into who or what controls the pausing and balance-adjustment functions — ideally a transparent multisig or DAO vote rather than a single private key. Check whether liquidity being unlocked is explained by the token's design (for example, if liquidity sits with a DAO treasury rather than a private wallet). Review the top holder addresses to see if they're known treasury, staking contracts, or exchange wallets rather than anonymous individual accounts. Look at the project's governance documentation, audit history, and any public statements about admin key management, and cross-reference this with independent sources rather than relying on any single check.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.