| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 31.4% | Holder distribution | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 923413 | Token contract | 11 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xf55037…7d1780 |
| Holders | 923,413 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x5a52e9…70efcb | 4.22% |
| #2 · contract | 0xbc10f2…fcdb5e | 4.09% |
| #3 · contract | 0x9bbb46…cc8db8 | 3.00% |
| #4 · contract | 0x8652fb…4de081 | 3.00% |
| #5 · contract | 0x76287e…461a04 | 3.00% |
This automated check looked at the LINK contract's code and on-chain behaviour, and as of the check date it did not detect several mechanisms that are commonly used to disadvantage holders. There is no admin mint function present, meaning the contract owner was not found to have a built-in way to create new tokens and dilute supply. Transfers were not found to be pausable, so the owner does not appear able to freeze trading at will, and no address blacklist function was detected, meaning there is no evidence of a mechanism to block specific wallets from buying or selling. The contract is not upgradeable, so its core rules are not set up to be swapped out after the fact. Buy and sell tax both came back at 0%, and a transfer simulation confirmed the token is sellable, which is consistent with no honeypot behaviour being detected. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the published code can be independently read and checked line by line. Two points stand out: liquidity is not locked, which means the liquidity pool's tokens are not committed to stay in place for any fixed period, and the top 10 holders control 31.4% of supply, a concentration level worth factoring into how you think about sell pressure.
It is important to understand what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics and on-chain data only — it cannot tell you anything about the team behind a project, how tokens are allocated or vested, the legal structure of the issuing entity, or the intent of whoever deployed or administers the contract. A contract can score well on mechanics and still sit inside a broader project with weak governance, concentrated off-chain control, or undisclosed arrangements that no code scan will surface. This result is also a snapshot: ownership, liquidity status and contract permissions can change after the check was run.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at a few concrete things yourself. Check whether the contract has a renounced or multisig-controlled owner address, and if multisig, who the signers are. Look at the liquidity pool directly on a chain explorer to see who holds the LP tokens and whether they could withdraw liquidity. Review the top holder addresses to see if they're exchanges, known treasury wallets, or unidentified individual addresses. Read up on the project's team, roadmap and token allocation schedule from primary sources rather than marketing material, and consider how holder concentration and unlocked liquidity might affect price behaviour in a stressed market. None of this constitutes investment advice, and this report does not predict future performance.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.