| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 71% | Holder distribution | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 23062 | Token contract | 29 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb22dc7…562c96 |
| Current owner | 0xb22dc7…562c96 |
| Holders | 23,062 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x8a4b4c…a015ce | 18.11% |
| #2 | 0xa60453…d951b2 | 16.32% |
| #3 | 0xf97781…41acec | 13.03% |
| #4 | 0x884ad5…1c4e9b | 4.54% |
| #5 | 0x0fcb19…5bab0c | 4.50% |
This automated check of the CELR contract on Ethereum returned a score of 12 out of 18, based on contract mechanics detected on the date of the scan. A few points are worth translating into plain terms. The contract includes a function that lets the owner pause transfers, which means that under certain conditions the owner could freeze the ability of holders to move or sell their tokens; this capability was found enabled in the contract code, not merely theoretical. No admin minting function was detected, meaning nothing indicates the owner can create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders, and no address blacklist function was found, so nothing suggests individual wallets can be selectively blocked from transacting. Buy and sell tax were both read as 0%, and a transfer simulation indicated the token is currently sellable, meaning no honeypot-style selling block was detected at the time of the check. Top-10 wallets hold 71% of the supply, which is a high concentration — a small number of holders have the ability to influence price significantly through their own trading. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool retains the ability to withdraw it, which is a separate risk from anything the token contract itself controls.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who is behind the project, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether marketing claims match reality, whether there's a functioning product or roadmap, or whether any legal or regulatory obligations apply. Verified source code means the code is human-readable on the block explorer; it does not mean anyone has reviewed it for intent, nor does it speak to the team's history or reputation.
Before considering any transaction, it would be reasonable to look at how liquidity is distributed and whether it sits in a known lock contract with a visible unlock date, to look at the wallet history of the largest holders to see whether they behave like long-term participants or frequent sellers, to check whether the pausable function has ever been triggered in the contract's transaction history, and to look for independent information about the team, audits, and the project's actual usage beyond this single contract-level check.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.