| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 31.5% | Holder distribution | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 3985 | Token contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x49071f…b5c279 |
| Holders | 3,985 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 9.04% |
| #2 · contract | 0xd8da6b…a96045 | 4.04% |
| #3 · contract | 0x000000…e08a90 | 3.12% |
| #4 · contract | 0x2d5104…69234a | 3.10% |
| #5 · contract | 0x7f6e4e…609ee2 | 2.50% |
This automated check looked at the ZC (zipcoin) contract on Ethereum and scored 17 out of 18 based on mechanics that can be read directly from the code. In practice, this means the contract does not currently contain an admin mint function, so the owner cannot create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. Transfers are not pausable, meaning no address has the ability to freeze the token so it can't be moved. No blacklist function was detected, so the contract does not appear to let an owner block specific wallets from trading. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, which means its logic cannot be swapped out later for different behaviour without holders' knowledge. A sell simulation confirmed the token can currently be sold, which is a basic check for honeypot behaviour — contracts that let you buy but block selling. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, so anyone can read the actual logic rather than trusting an unverified black box. One figure worth noting on its own: the top 10 holders control 31.5% of supply, which is a meaningful concentration — large holders selling at once can move the price significantly.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is a mechanical read of the smart contract as it exists today, on the date of the check. It says nothing about the team behind the project, whether their identities are known or verifiable, how the token's economics are designed to function over time, whether any legal or regulatory structure applies, or what the stated intentions of the creators are. A contract can look clean mechanically while still being attached to a project with weak fundamentals, an anonymous team, or misleading marketing. Buy and sell tax data was not available from the contract in this check, so transaction costs on trades are currently unconfirmed.
Before putting money into any token, it's worth looking beyond contract mechanics. Check who holds the top wallets and whether any single address beyond the top 10 could exert outsized influence. Look for information about the team — are they named, is there a track record, is there a working product rather than just a token. Review whether liquidity is locked and for how long, since unlocked liquidity can be withdrawn by whoever controls it. Read the project's own documentation and community channels for how tokens are distributed and vested. None of this replaces independent research, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.