Before you buy: How much real money is in the pool, what do you lose selling $1,000, and who can pull it out?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 721 | Token contract | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x0924ce…205cc2 |
| Current owner | 0x0924ce…205cc2 |
| Holders | 721 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x0924ce…205cc2 | 100.00% |
| #2 | 0x7b9170…f651b1 | 0.00% |
| #3 | 0xa58152…a60cef | 0.00% |
| #4 | 0x3289a8…a0c781 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0x639e15…e9a828 | 0.00% |
This automated check looked at the token's contract code and a snapshot of on-chain activity, and here is what the findings actually mean. The transfer simulation showed the token can be sold, and no honeypot behaviour was detected at the time of the check. Buy and sell tax both came back at 0%, meaning no extra fee was detected being deducted on transactions. No admin mint function was found in the contract, which would otherwise let the owner create new tokens and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so the ability to freeze all transfers was not found. No blacklist function was detected, which would otherwise let an address be blocked from sending or receiving tokens. The contract is also not upgradeable through a proxy, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out after the fact for different behaviour. Source code is verified on the block explorer, so the logic described above can be independently read by anyone, rather than taken on trust. The one notable figure here is holder concentration: the top 10 holders control 100% of supply, which for a widely issued stablecoin like USDC typically reflects large exchange, custody and smart-contract addresses holding balances on behalf of many underlying users, rather than a handful of individuals.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It reads contract mechanics only — it says nothing about the team behind the deployment, how the token is distributed or allocated going forward, the business or legal structure issuing it, or the intent of whoever controls any admin keys. A verified, non-mint, non-pausable contract tells you what the code currently allows; it does not tell you whether the entity behind it is reputable, solvent, or regulated in your jurisdiction.
Before putting money in, it's worth checking the issuer's own transparency pages and attestations, confirming the contract address you're interacting with matches the one published by the official project (not a lookalike), reviewing recent audit reports if available, and checking whether any admin or multisig wallet addresses tied to the contract have a visible history of unusual activity on a block explorer. Since this is an automated check reflecting conditions on the day it ran, re-checking periodically is reasonable, as contract permissions and holder distribution can change over time.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.