| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 21.8% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100%, end date unknown | LP holders · TeamFinance | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 241 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xc3de81…6a0e3b |
| Holders | 241 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0xa4e872…70c3ec | 12.68% |
| #2 | 0x87bec6…5034fc | 1.77% |
| #3 | 0x604f89…7ef8e9 | 1.62% |
| #4 | 0x21f5a8…32dee3 | 1.19% |
| #5 | 0xd0f3d8…69aef1 | 0.82% |
This automated check looked at the contract code for PEPE6900 on Ethereum and found no honeypot behaviour: a simulated transfer went through, meaning holders were able to sell at the time of the check. Buy and sell taxes were both read as 0%, so no fee was detected being deducted from trades. No admin mint function was found, which means the contract, as written, does not appear to let the owner create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so the owner does not appear able to freeze all transfers. No blacklist function was found, meaning there's no on-chain mechanism visible for blocking specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, so its logic cannot be swapped out later by the deployer. Liquidity shows as 100% locked, though the lock's end date could not be determined, so it is not possible to say when that liquidity could become withdrawable again. Holder concentration sits at 21.8% among the top 10 wallets, which is a moderate concentration — worth keeping in mind, not a pass-or-fail signal on its own.
It's worth being clear about what this does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only, run at a single point in time — nothing here was reviewed by a person. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how the token's supply and incentives are structured, whether there are off-chain promises or legal exposure, or whether the people controlling the locked liquidity or the top wallets intend to act in holders' interests. A clean mechanical read is not an endorsement and does not rule out behaviour that happens outside the contract itself, such as coordinated selling by large holders or misleading marketing.
Before putting money in, it would be sensible to look up the liquidity lock directly on TeamFinance to see the actual unlock date rather than relying on "unknown," check whether the top-10 wallets include known exchange or team addresses (which reads very differently from unrelated individual holders), search for the team's public presence and any prior projects, and review the token's own documentation for how supply, fees, or ownership privileges might change in future. Because this is Ethereum, it's also worth checking current gas costs and overall liquidity depth before trading, since thin liquidity can make both entering and exiting a position more costly than it first appears.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.