| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 5 | Token contract | 10 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 15 Jan 2026 — 238 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x183aef…834b16 |
| Deployed by | 0x1942c5…978419 |
| Current owner | 0x89ab92…f9777f |
| Holders | 5 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x8549f3…35bf99 | 30.83% |
| #2 | 0x71720e…2ab2b4 | 25.00% |
| #3 | 0x0f614e…8f6fde | 21.25% |
| #4 | 0x729d89…531436 | 20.42% |
| #5 | 0x339180…7493ca | 2.50% |
This automated check looked at BTW's contract mechanics on Ethereum and scored 12 out of 18. In practical terms, this means a few specific abilities that a contract owner could use against holders were checked for, and were not detected on the date of this scan: there is no admin mint function present, so the owner cannot appear to create new tokens out of nothing and dilute existing holders; transfers are not pausable, meaning the contract does not currently give anyone the power to freeze trading; there is no address blacklist mechanism, so no function was found that could block specific wallets from selling; and the contract is not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its underlying logic cannot be swapped out later without deploying a new contract. A sell simulation also returned "sellable," meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected in that test. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows anyone to read the actual code rather than relying on a hidden or unreadable contract. However, buy and sell tax data was not available from this check, so any transaction fees built into the contract were not confirmed either way.
One finding stands out and deserves separate attention: the top 10 holders control 100% of the supply, across only 5 holders in total. This is an extremely high concentration level, and it means a very small number of wallets hold the entire circulating supply, which carries obvious implications for how easily the token's price could move if any of those wallets sell.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team is real or anonymous, how tokenomics are structured beyond raw holder percentages, whether there is a working product or roadmap, or any legal status or regulatory compliance. No human has reviewed this token, and the absence of a flag simply means that particular risk indicator was not detected in this automated scan on this date — it is not a certification that the contract is safe, legitimate, or free of other risks not covered by this tool.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth independently verifying who controls those five wallets and whether any are exchange or liquidity-pool addresses rather than individual holders, checking whether liquidity is locked and for how long, looking for an audit from an independent security firm, searching for the team's public identity and track record, and reading the contract's tax and fee functions directly or through a second tool, since that data was not returned here. Cross-referencing holder activity over time on a block explorer can also help you judge whether concentration is increasing or decreasing.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.