| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 70.3% | Holder distribution | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 91026 | Token contract | 28 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xfddac1…964837 |
| Holders | 91,026 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xcd3898…340bf2 | 39.69% |
| #2 · contract | 0x2f1d27…12d580 | 20.62% |
| #3 | 0xf97781…41acec | 3.38% |
| #4 | 0xf42aac…36f173 | 1.24% |
| #5 | 0x95b166…ecced7 | 0.92% |
This automated check scanned the CHZ contract on Ethereum and returned a score of 12 out of 18. In plain terms, here is what each finding means for someone holding the token. Transfers being pausable means the contract owner has a function that can be used to freeze token movement across the network — holders would be unable to send or sell during a pause, for any reason the owner chooses. Top-10 wallets controlling 70% of supply means a small number of addresses could sell in size, or simply hold outsized influence over how the supply moves, which can affect liquidity and price independent of overall demand. Source code being verified is a positive signal for transparency, since it means the actual contract logic on the explorer matches what's deployed and can be read by anyone, rather than being hidden. Liquidity not being locked means the funds backing the token's tradability on decentralised exchanges could in theory be withdrawn by whoever controls that liquidity, which is a separate risk from the token contract itself. No admin mint function, no blacklist capability, and no upgradeable proxy were detected on the date of this check, meaning the owner does not currently appear able to create new tokens, block specific addresses from trading, or swap the contract's underlying code.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — things like pause functions, tax settings, mint permissions, and holder distribution. It says nothing about the team behind the project, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a working product, the legal status of the entity involved, or anyone's intent. A contract can score well here and still be part of a project with weak fundamentals, and a contract with flags can belong to an established, actively maintained network — context matters.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who controls the pause function and whether its use is disclosed anywhere, checking if liquidity sits with a known exchange or custodian rather than an anonymous wallet, reviewing the project's own documentation and audit history if one exists, and looking at how the top holder wallets are labelled — exchanges, foundations, and team wallets behave differently from unknown addresses. None of this substitutes for your own research, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold, or avoid the token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.