| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 69.5% | Holder distribution | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 90762 | Token contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 26 Oct 2018 — 2,878 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0xff1f7f…c02403 |
| Deployed by | 0xfddac1…964837 |
| Holders | 90,762 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xcd3898…340bf2 | 39.69% |
| #2 | 0x2f1d27…12d580 | 20.60% |
| #3 | 0xf97781…41acec | 2.50% |
| #4 | 0x611f7b…dfb09d | 1.48% |
| #5 | 0x95b166…ecced7 | 0.95% |
This automated check on CHZ (chiliZ) on Ethereum returned a score of 13 out of 18, based on contract mechanics detected on the date of the scan. Here is what the flags actually mean in practical terms. Transfers can be paused by the owner, which means that whoever controls the relevant admin key has the technical ability to freeze the movement of tokens for some or all holders at will — this is a function built into the contract, not evidence that it will be used. No admin mint function and no blacklist function were detected, meaning that, as coded, the contract does not appear to let the owner create new tokens out of thin air or block specific wallets from transacting. The contract is not upgradeable via proxy, so the underlying code logic cannot be swapped out silently after deployment. Source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning the contract logic is publicly readable and matches what is deployed, which allowed this automated check to inspect it directly. No buy or sell tax was detected, and a transfer simulation indicated the token is sellable, meaning no honeypot-style selling restriction was found at the time of testing. Separately, the top 10 holders control 69.5% of supply, and liquidity is not locked, meaning a large share of tokens sits in few wallets and the trading pool is not contractually protected from being withdrawn by whoever provided it.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not tell you. This is a purely automated read of contract code and on-chain data — no person has reviewed it, and no judgement has been made about the people or organisation behind the token. It says nothing about the team's identity or track record, the project's tokenomics or emission schedule, its legal structure, marketing claims, or intent. A contract can score well on mechanics while still being tied to a project with weak fundamentals or undisclosed plans, and vice versa.
Before putting money in, consider looking at who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or treasury addresses rather than individual insiders, checking whether liquidity pools are locked or held by a multisig with public terms, reviewing the project's own documentation and any audits by named third parties, and searching for the team's public presence and history. None of this constitutes investment advice, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.