| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 2 | Token contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 2 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV2 · contract | 0xeb0d88…f79d59 | 100.00% |
| #2 · contract | 0x2e0acb…6d81c0 | 100.00% |
This automated check scored Digital minimalism 0 out of 4 on Ethereum, and it's worth understanding exactly what that score does and doesn't cover. A simulated sell went through, and buy and sell tax both read at 0% at the time of the check, meaning this specific test transaction was not blocked and did not have tax deducted. However, the contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, which means the public cannot read the actual logic behind the bytecode — functions like admin mint, the ability to pause transfers, an address blacklist, or an upgradeable proxy pattern show as "no data" not because they're absent, but because they could not be confirmed either way. In practice, unverified source means a contract owner could potentially hold powers such as minting new tokens to dilute holders, blacklisting specific wallets from trading, pausing all transfers, or upgrading the contract's logic entirely after launch — none of this is confirmed to exist, but none of it can be ruled out either. Liquidity is also not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it at any time, and with only 2 holders recorded, the token has had essentially no distribution yet.
What this check does not tell you is anything about the people behind the project, their track record, whether the tokenomics make sense, whether there's a legal entity accountable for the project, or what the team actually intends to do with the powers the contract may or may not grant. This is a purely automated read of contract mechanics as they appeared on the date of the check — it does not assess intent, reputation, marketing claims, or future behaviour, and no human has reviewed this token.
Before considering any financial decision, it would be worth seeking out a verified source code copy (if one becomes available) and reading it yourself or having someone technical do so, checking whether the liquidity pool address and its lock status can be independently confirmed on a block explorer, researching the team's public identity and prior projects, and treating a holder count of 2 as an indication that the token has barely circulated — meaning there is very little trading history or behaviour to observe yet. Because so many core mechanics here read as "no data" rather than "confirmed absent," re-running this check later, once source is verified, may produce a materially different and more informative result than what's available today.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 4 points out of 100.
The other 96 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.