| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 65.9% | Holder distribution | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 7864 | Token contract | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 27 Oct 2025 — 313 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x8f563a…3b796f |
| Deployed by | 0x004fe3…313099 |
| Holders | 7,864 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xe554dc…989d62 | 23.43% |
| #2 | 0x3b4d79…cf5ca7 | 16.49% |
| #3 | 0xa9f5be…5e44e8 | 5.89% |
| #4 | 0x47fa2a…fab2d6 | 5.12% |
| #5 | 0xe5fd74…66fa59 | 4.24% |
This automated check on LIT (Lighter, Ethereum) scored 14 out of 18, and it's worth understanding exactly what that number reflects. A test transfer showed the token can be sold, which means no honeypot behaviour was detected on the date of the check — the contract does not appear to trap funds once purchased. No admin mint function was found, meaning the contract owner does not currently have a built-in way to create new tokens and dilute holders. Transfers are not pausable and no blacklist function was detected, so nothing in the code lets an admin freeze the contract or block specific wallets from moving their tokens. The contract is also not an upgradeable proxy, which means its logic cannot later be swapped out for different code without deploying an entirely new contract. On the other side of the ledger, the top 10 holders control 65.9% of the supply, a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could sell in a way that affects the market noticeably. Liquidity is also not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool retains the ability to withdraw it, which would affect the ability to sell the token at a stable price. The source code is verified on the block explorer, so the logic behind these findings is publicly viewable rather than hidden.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It reads contract mechanics only — it does not assess who the team behind LIT is, whether they have a track record, how the token's supply is allocated or vested over time, what the project's stated purpose or roadmap is, or whether any legal entity stands behind it. Buy and sell tax data was unavailable, so the actual cost of trading in and out of the token was not confirmed. None of this is a judgement on intent; it simply reflects the limits of an automated code-level scan.
Before considering any transaction, it's worth looking at where the liquidity sits and who controls it, since unlocked liquidity means it could be withdrawn at any time. It's also worth researching who holds those top wallets, whether they're exchange or team addresses, and checking independently for any public information about the team, audits, or community history. Testing a small buy and sell first can help confirm real-world tax and slippage, since that data was not available here. Treat this score as one input into a broader decision, not a verdict.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.