| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 74.4% | Holder distribution | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 20414 | Token contract | 12 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 20 Feb 2024 — 935 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x3b8ad6…224675 |
| Deployed by | 0x96e30e…a843b8 |
| Current owner | 0x370a97…4a3fc6 |
| Holders | 20,414 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xf97781…41acec | 28.39% |
| #2 | 0x43684d…26f042 | 13.61% |
| #3 | 0x28c6c0…f21d60 | 6.70% |
| #4 | 0xc43038…092ad4 | 4.98% |
| #5 | 0x56b6e3…ec3f49 | 4.83% |
This automated check scanned the PORTAL contract on Ethereum and scored 12 out of 18 on the mechanics it looks for. In practical terms, a few things stand out. Transfers can be paused by the contract owner, which means that at any point the owner could halt the ability of holders to move or sell their tokens — a function that, if activated, would leave holders unable to exit a position until transfers are re-enabled. No admin mint function was detected, meaning that on the date of this check, nothing in the contract code suggests the owner can create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No address blacklist function was detected, so there was no evidence of a mechanism to block specific wallets from transacting. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out after deployment. Buy and sell taxes both read as 0%, and a transfer simulation indicates the token is currently sellable, so no honeypot-style trading restriction was detected. However, top-10 wallets hold 74.4% of the supply, which is a high concentration — a small number of holders could move the market significantly by selling. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, allowing the code to be read by anyone, but liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it without notice.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract code and on-chain data only — things like whether transfers can be paused, whether tax rates are hardcoded, and how tokens are distributed among wallets. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team's stated plans are credible, how the token's economics are designed to function over time, or whether any legal or regulatory structure exists around it. A verified, pausable-free-seeming contract can still sit behind a team with no real product, and a technically "clean" contract score is not an assessment of intent.
Before putting money in, it would be worth looking at who controls the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, checking the liquidity pool directly to see who holds the LP tokens and whether they are locked elsewhere, reviewing the project's public team information and any audits from named third parties, and reading the contract's owner-permission functions yourself or via a second independent tool to confirm what pausing transfers would actually look like in practice.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.