| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 81.2% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 20282 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x96e30e…a843b8 |
| Current owner | 0x370a97…4a3fc6 |
| Holders | 20,282 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xf97781…41acec | 39.92% |
| #2 | 0x43684d…26f042 | 13.61% |
| #3 · contract | 0x56b6e3…ec3f49 | 10.00% |
| #4 · contract | 0xc43038…092ad4 | 4.23% |
| #5 | 0xf42aac…36f173 | 3.75% |
This automated check scored PORTAL 12 out of 18 on contract mechanics, and a few points are worth translating into plain terms. Transfers being pausable means the contract owner holds a switch that can stop some or all wallets from moving or selling the token at any time, for any reason, without needing holder approval. This did not block a sale during the automated test performed today, and no admin minting function, blacklist, or upgradeable proxy was detected as present on the date of this check — meaning the owner does not currently appear able to create new tokens out of thin air, block specific addresses individually, or swap out the contract's code. However, the pause function alone is a meaningful lever of control that sits with whoever holds the owner key. Separately, the top 10 wallets hold 81.3% of the supply, which is a high concentration: if a small number of holders decide to sell at the same time, it can move the price sharply, and it also means those wallets may have outsized influence on anything requiring community coordination. Liquidity not being locked means whoever supplied the trading pool is free to withdraw it at any time, which would make the token difficult or impossible to sell at a fair price on that pool.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It reads only what's written in the contract and what's visible on-chain today — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a history of reliability, what their plans for token distribution or future unlocks are, whether there's a legal entity accountable anywhere, or what their actual intentions are. No human has reviewed this project; the result is generated automatically from contract code and on-chain data at a single point in time, and conditions like the pause state, holder balances, or liquidity can change afterward.
Before considering any transaction, it's worth looking into who controls the owner wallet and whether ownership has been renounced, searching for the project's team identity and any audit reports from independent firms, checking the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see if and when it could be withdrawn, and reviewing recent large holder transactions for signs of concentrated selling. Community channels and independent discussion elsewhere can also provide context this kind of automated check cannot capture.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.