| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 99.1% | Holder distribution | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1498 | Token contract | 2 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x739190…7323d9 |
| Current owner | 0x739190…7323d9 |
| Holders | 1,498 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 43.17% |
| #2 · contract | 0x1156c9…de6630 | 12.50% |
| #3 · contract | 0xb542ff…183b30 | 10.00% |
| #4 · contract | 0x504aba…fd3c64 | 9.00% |
| #5 · contract | 0xfb20ae…bcf60a | 6.83% |
This automated check looked at WXT's contract code and current on-chain data, and scored it 12 out of 18. In practical terms, several risky capabilities were not detected as of the date of this check: there is no mint function that would let the contract owner create new tokens out of thin air, no ability to pause transfers and freeze holders' tokens, no blacklist function to block specific wallets from trading, and the contract is not an upgradeable proxy, meaning its logic cannot be swapped out later for something different. A simulated transfer also completed successfully with 0% buy and sell tax, so there was no honeypot behaviour detected and no evidence of hidden fees being deducted on trades. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the actual logic is publicly readable rather than hidden. Set against that, two findings stand out as notable risk indicators: the top 10 wallet addresses hold 99.1% of the entire supply, and the liquidity backing the token is not locked. Concentrated holdings mean a small number of wallets could sell large amounts at once, and unlocked liquidity means whoever controls it could withdraw it from the trading pool at any time, which can leave a token difficult or impossible to sell at a reasonable price.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team's identities are known or credible, how the tokenomics are structured beyond raw holder percentages, whether any legal entity stands behind the token, or what the stated intentions of the developers are. A clean read on contract mechanics says nothing about whether the people controlling those concentrated wallets or the unlocked liquidity intend to act in holders' interests.
Given that, concrete next steps would include looking up the liquidity pool address directly on a block explorer to see who currently controls it and whether a locking transaction exists anywhere, checking whether the top holder wallets are known entities (such as exchange or team wallets) rather than anonymous addresses, searching for any public information about the team behind WWEEX Token and WXT, and reviewing the project's own documentation or announcements about liquidity and token distribution plans. None of this constitutes investment advice, and this summary does not indicate whether WXT is safe or unsafe to interact with.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.