| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 40.7% | Holder distribution | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 25692 | Token contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 19 May 2022 — 1,574 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0xf5679e…a0ad59 |
| Deployed by | 0xe0bbfd…a2e69f |
| Current owner | 0x9ed857…1b8fe7 |
| Holders | 25,692 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x9ea0f7…d57a45 | 13.34% |
| #2 | 0x27f7a5…5528cd | 6.60% |
| #3 | 0xaa6e91…b82ca0 | 4.69% |
| #4 | 0x3b9308…ed2cd6 | 4.45% |
| #5 | 0x2b52e6…9cc785 | 4.02% |
This automated check scanned EURC's contract mechanics on Ethereum and scored 15 out of 18. Several of the findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract uses an upgradeable proxy, which means whoever controls the admin keys can swap out the underlying logic of the contract at a future date — in practice, this means the rules governing the token could change after you hold it, even if today's rules look standard. No admin mint function, transfer-pausing capability, or address blacklist was detected on the date of this check, meaning the contract does not currently appear able to create new tokens at will, freeze transfers, or block specific wallets from moving funds. Buy and sell tax were both found to be 0%, and a transfer simulation indicated the token is sellable, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected. The top 10 holders together control 40.7% of supply, which is a concentration level worth being aware of since large holders moving funds can affect available liquidity or market conditions. Liquidity was found not to be locked, meaning whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, allowing the underlying code to be publicly read.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is a purely automated read of on-chain contract mechanics — it does not assess who is behind the token, their track record, intentions, or business structure. EURC is issued by Circle, a named, licensed company, but that fact comes from public information outside this contract scan, not from anything this tool verified. This check also says nothing about tokenomics design, regulatory status, reserve backing, or legal recourse if something goes wrong. A high score here reflects the absence of certain risky contract patterns on the day of the check; it is not a certification of trustworthiness, and mechanics can change if the proxy is upgraded.
Before putting money in, it's worth independently confirming the issuer's identity and regulatory standing, checking whether reserves or backing claims are attested by a third party, looking at who holds the upgrade/admin keys and whether they're a multisig or single wallet, reviewing the liquidity pool directly to see who supplies it and how easily it could be pulled, and checking recent on-chain activity from the top holders. Re-running this kind of check periodically is also sensible, since contract behaviour tied to an upgradeable proxy can change without your token balance changing.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.