| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 59.2% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 21302 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x702099…782fc2 |
| Current owner | 0xc9d3b7…6b000b |
| Holders | 21,302 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x6a0b36…c12b52 | 12.59% |
| #2 | 0xcf5ad1…1a401a | 10.87% |
| #3 | 0xad60c7…f2f614 | 9.76% |
| #4 | 0x28c6c0…f21d60 | 6.34% |
| #5 | 0xc82cdd…92bb87 | 5.38% |
This automated check found that the contract's sell function executed successfully in simulation, and both buy and sell tax are currently set to 0%, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected on the date of this check. However, the contract includes an enabled admin mint function, which means the owner retains the ability to create new tokens at will, a capability that can dilute the value of existing holdings if exercised. Liquidity is also not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool tokens could withdraw paired assets from the trading pool, reducing or removing the ability to trade at a stable price. Top-10 wallets hold 59.2% of total supply, a concentration level that means a small number of addresses could exert significant influence over the market if they chose to sell. No pause function or address blacklist was detected, so the contract does not currently appear to give the owner the ability to freeze transfers or block specific wallets from moving tokens, and the contract is not upgradeable, meaning its core logic cannot be swapped out after deployment. The source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows the underlying logic to be read and checked by anyone.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code permissions, tax settings, mint functions, and holder distribution as recorded on-chain. It says nothing about who the team behind the token is, whether they have a track record, what the token's actual utility or tokenomics model is meant to achieve, whether any legal entity stands behind it, or what their stated or actual intentions are. A contract can show no risky permissions and still be part of a project with weak fundamentals, and conversely a contract with some owner powers present may belong to a team that has no intention of misusing them. Mechanics are not motives.
Before putting money into this token, it would be worth looking into who controls the owner wallet and whether that control sits with a multisig or a single key, checking whether the liquidity pool tokens are held by an identifiable address or a burn address despite showing as unlocked, searching for any audit reports or public team identity, reviewing the project's own documentation on mint policy and supply caps, and watching holder distribution over time to see whether concentration is increasing or decreasing.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.