| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 31.3% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1575 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x99f4fd…d0336c |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 1,575 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x000000…e08a90 | 13.46% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 3.48% |
| #3 · contract | 0x6910c5…b5feda | 2.80% |
| #4 | 0x9048a5…ddd9b1 | 2.07% |
| #5 · contract | 0x0d2cb9…16d751 | 2.04% |
This automated check looked at the FUSE contract's code and current on-chain data and found no mint function, no pause function, no blacklist function, and no upgradeable proxy pattern on the date of the check. In practical terms, that means nobody has a built-in switch in the contract to create new tokens out of thin air, freeze your wallet's transfers, block specific addresses from trading, or swap out the contract's logic after the fact. A test transfer simulation also showed the token can be sold, with 0% buy tax and 0% sell tax detected, so no honeypot behaviour or hidden fee was picked up at the time of testing. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, meaning the code backing the token is publicly readable rather than hidden. Two things stand out as not favourable: liquidity is not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool could in theory withdraw it, reducing or removing the ability to trade the token at a stable price; and the top 10 holders control 31.3% of supply, which is a meaningful concentration — large holders selling at once can move the price sharply against smaller holders.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not know who the team is, whether they are doxxed or anonymous, what their track record is, how the token's economics are designed to play out over time, or whether there is any legal entity standing behind the project. A clean contract read says nothing about intent: a contract can be technically unremarkable and still be attached to a project with weak fundamentals, an unsustainable token model, or a team that disappears. None of the findings above should be read as a judgement on the people or business behind FUSE.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at a few concrete things this check didn't touch: who holds and controls the liquidity pool, and whether there's any stated plan or timeline to lock it; who the top holders actually are (team wallets, exchange wallets, or unrelated individuals) and whether that's disclosed anywhere; whether the project has a public team, audit reports from a named firm, and active, verifiable communication channels; and how the token's supply and distribution were structured at launch. Cross-checking the liquidity lock status directly on a lock-tracking tool and reviewing the project's own documentation would be reasonable next steps.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.