| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes | Contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 23.5% | Holder distribution | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 16886 | Token contract | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 14 Feb 2023 — 1,303 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0xb273e7…5aca5f |
| Deployed by | 0xeb2201…df9f51 |
| Holders | 16,886 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xeb2201…df9f51 | 8.42% |
| #2 | 0x403b1b…f299ea | 3.82% |
| #3 | 0x719eba…8e395e | 2.33% |
| #4 | 0xd24994…790726 | 1.66% |
| #5 | 0x88e23c…cf7b0e | 1.66% |
This automated check scanned Bonk's contract code on Ethereum and found four things worth understanding before going further. The contract uses an upgradeable proxy, which means the logic behind the token can be swapped out after deployment — whoever controls the upgrade key could change how the contract behaves at a later date, including in ways not visible in the current code. Top-10 wallets hold 23.5% of supply, meaning a relatively small number of holders could sell large amounts at once, which can move the price sharply. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, so the deployed code is readable and matches what's publicly listed — this makes independent review possible, though it doesn't confirm the code is free of concerning mechanisms elsewhere in the system. Liquidity is not locked, which means whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it, potentially leaving buyers unable to sell at a fair price. On the reassuring side, no mint function, transfer pause, or blacklist capability was detected on the date of this check, buy and sell tax both read 0%, and a transfer simulation indicated the token can be sold.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract mechanics only — the functions written into the code and how they behave in a simulation. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a working product or roadmap, or whether any of this complies with regulation in your jurisdiction. A contract can score well on mechanics and still carry significant risk from concentrated ownership, an unlocked liquidity pool, or upgrade permissions that get used later. None of the findings here are a judgement on intent, and no human has reviewed this contract — the results come entirely from automated analysis.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth looking into who controls the proxy's upgrade key and whether that control sits with a single wallet or a multi-signature arrangement with a delay. Check whether the liquidity pool tokens are held by an identifiable address and whether there's any stated plan to lock them. Look at the distribution of the top holders in more detail — whether they're exchange wallets, team allocations, or unrelated individual holders changes the picture considerably. It's also worth searching for independent commentary on the project, checking whether the team is public or anonymous, and reviewing any available audit reports from third parties, since this check does not constitute one. Treat this score as one input describing contract-level behaviour on the date it was run, not a conclusion about the token as a whole.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.