| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 59% | Holder distribution | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1658 | Token contract | 24 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb5b011…358fd8 |
| Current owner | 0x70ae25…a2192c |
| Holders | 1,658 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0x406803…62bd59 | 18.81% |
| #2 | 0x0d565f…4e4c11 | 17.53% |
| #3 · contract | 0xe8c060…38a2e5 | 7.34% |
| #4 | 0x1d425d…b0549b | 4.13% |
| #5 | 0x6159af…59cbb1 | 2.80% |
This automated check scored this token 12 out of 18, and the individual findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract's owner-controlled mint function means whoever holds the admin keys can create new tokens at will, which can dilute existing holders' share of supply without warning. Top-10 wallets holding 59% of supply indicates high concentration risk: if any of those large holders decide to sell, it can move the price significantly, and it also means a small number of parties have outsized influence over the token's circulating supply. Liquidity not being locked means whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it, which in some configurations can leave buyers holding a token with little or no way to sell. On the more reassuring side, no honeypot behaviour was detected in the sell simulation, buy and sell taxes both read as 0%, there is no pausable-transfer function or blacklist mechanism present in the contract, it is not an upgradeable proxy, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, meaning it can be read and audited by anyone. These are all findings as of the date of this check; they describe what the automated scan detected in the contract at this moment, not a permanent guarantee.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanical behaviour only — things like tax rates, mint permissions, and transfer restrictions written into the code. It says nothing about who the team behind the token is, whether they have a track record, how the tokenomics are structured beyond raw holder percentages, what legal entity if any stands behind the project, or what the team's actual intentions are. A contract can look mechanically clean while still being part of a project with weak fundamentals, an anonymous team, or no real use case, and none of that would show up here.
Before making any decision, it's worth digging further on your own. Look up who controls the admin/owner wallet and whether it's a multisig or a single key, check whether the mint function has been used recently or has any caps on it, search for the liquidity pool address on a chain explorer to see who owns the LP tokens and whether they've moved them, and look into the project's public team information, audit history if any, and community discussion for independent commentary. None of this replaces your own research, and nothing here should be read as advice to buy, hold, or sell.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.