| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 59 | Token contract | 11 Sept 2026 |
| Contract deployed | 4 Mar 2026 — 191 days ago |
| Deployment transaction | 0x7f6a46…9c033f |
| Deployed by | 0x0c5401…f50b36 |
| Current owner | 0x456dd0…6b67a4 |
| Holders | 59 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x456dd0…6b67a4 | 99.99% |
| #2 | 0xdc45c9…6cdb11 | 0.00% |
| #3 | 0x000000…e08a90 | 0.00% |
| #4 | 0xad512e…8b2c8e | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0x7c238f…88772c | 0.00% |
This automated check of the UP (Unitas) contract on Ethereum returned a score of 12 out of 18, and it is worth translating what that actually covers before drawing any conclusions. A test transfer showed the token can be sold, and no admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, no address blacklist capability, and no upgradeable proxy pattern were detected in the contract code as of the date of this check. In practical terms, this means the contract owner does not currently appear to hold the ability to mint unlimited new tokens, freeze wallets, block specific addresses from trading, or swap out the contract's logic after the fact — at least not through the mechanisms this scan looks for. The contract source code is also verified on the block explorer, meaning the code behind the token is publicly readable rather than hidden, which allows this kind of automated review to take place at all. Two findings stand out as risk indicators: the top 10 holders control 100% of the supply, and liquidity is not locked. High concentration among a small number of wallets means a small group has the practical ability to sell in size and move the price sharply if they choose to. Unlocked liquidity means whoever supplied the trading pool is free to withdraw it at any time, which would make the token difficult or impossible to sell at a reasonable price. Buy tax and sell tax data were not available from the contract in this check, so any transaction fees applied on trades are unknown from this scan alone.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not tell you. This is an automated review of contract mechanics only — it looks at code patterns, holder distribution and liquidity status. It says nothing about who the team behind Unitas actually is, whether their stated plans or roadmap are realistic, how the token's economics are designed to function over time, or whether any legal or regulatory structure sits behind the project. No human has reviewed this token, and nothing here should be read as a judgement on the intentions of the people running it.
Given the concentration and liquidity findings in particular, it would be reasonable to look further before acting. That could include checking whether the liquidity pool tokens are held in a known locking contract or a private wallet, looking at whether the top holder wallets have a history of large sells, searching for any independent audit of the contract, and reviewing whatever public information exists about the team and the project's stated purpose. None of this constitutes investment advice, and this check does not indicate whether the token is safe to buy or hold.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.