| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 91.4% | Holder distribution | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 337061 | Token contract | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x7ba7ef…07d8b3 |
| Current owner | 0x000000…883cc9 |
| Holders | 337,061 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xd42302…a4c261 | 30.97% |
| #2 | 0x700000…60ad34 | 25.39% |
| #3 | 0x2bb12a…95ca7d | 24.75% |
| #4 | 0x93904e…e6a1d1 | 5.23% |
| #5 | 0x43594d…def7cb | 1.81% |
This automated check scored TUSD 4 out of 10 on the date it was run. A few things stand out. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which means the code behind the token can be read and checked by anyone — this is a positive indicator but not proof of good intent. The simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both at 0%, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected during this test. However, several contract mechanics — including admin mint ability, whether transfers can be paused, and whether addresses can be blacklisted — were not reported by the data source and so were not scored. This means the check cannot currently confirm or rule out whether the contract owner retains the ability to mint new tokens, freeze transfers, or block specific wallets from trading. Top-10 wallet addresses hold 91.4% of the supply, a high concentration that means a small number of holders could materially affect the market by moving their holdings. Liquidity was found to not be locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool retains the ability to withdraw it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not tell you. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess who is behind the project, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there are legal or regulatory structures in place, or the intentions of the team. A verified contract and a clean tax simulation say nothing about whether the entity issuing or backing the token (in TUSD's case, a stablecoin issuer) is solvent, compliant, or acting in holders' interests. No human has reviewed this contract or the project behind it; the findings above come entirely from automated data sources as of the check date.
Before putting money into this or any token, it's worth independently verifying who controls the admin or owner wallet and what permissions it currently holds, checking whether liquidity lock status has changed since this check, looking at the history and reputation of the issuing entity, reviewing any published attestations or audits (particularly relevant for a stablecoin claiming asset backing), and checking holder concentration and liquidity conditions again close to the time of any transaction, since these figures change over time. None of the findings here constitute financial advice, and none of them confirm that the token is safe or that it is not.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.