| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 48% | Holder distribution | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 46384 | Token contract | 6 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x85de33…b282e5 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 46,384 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x8894e0…e2d4e3 | 34.38% |
| #2 | 0x0a6ebe…90119e | 2.50% |
| #3 | 0xcc0c58…bd5cc5 | 2.26% |
| #4 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 2.17% |
| #5 | 0xde52c7…0628c1 | 1.50% |
This automated check on MarsCoin (BSC) found no honeypot behaviour: a transfer simulation showed the token is sellable, and buy and sell tax both read 0% at the time of the check. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. Transfers do not appear pausable, so the owner does not seem able to freeze the token contract and stop everyone from trading. No address blacklist function was detected, meaning there is no mechanism found that would let the owner block specific wallets from selling. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, so its logic cannot be swapped out later for different, possibly less favourable, code. Source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the actual logic is publicly readable rather than hidden behind bytecode alone. Two points stand out as risk indicators rather than reassurances: the top 10 holders control 48% of the supply, a concentration level that means a small number of wallets could move the market if they sell together, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could, in principle, withdraw it and leave buyers unable to sell at a reasonable price.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics on-chain as they exist on the day of the check — it does not assess who the team behind MarsCoin is, whether they have a track record, how the token's supply and incentives are structured over time, whether any legal entity stands behind it, or what their actual intentions are. A contract can look mechanically clean while still being part of a project with weak fundamentals or bad-faith actors, and mechanics can also change if the contract is redeployed or ownership is reassigned after this check runs.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at who currently holds the liquidity pool tokens and whether that wallet is a known locker or exchange, checking the transaction history of the top 10 holders for coordinated buying or selling patterns, searching for the project's social channels and team identity claims and treating anonymous teams as an open question rather than a settled one, and rerunning this same check periodically, since ownership, liquidity status and holder concentration can all shift after the fact.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.