| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 3% | Flap token code | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 3% | Flap token code | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 68.6% | Holder distribution | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 99.93% burned | LP holders · Flap launch pool | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 50685 | Token contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x85de33…b282e5 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 50,685 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xf97781…41acec | 53.00% |
| #2 | 0x8894e0…e2d4e3 | 4.75% |
| #3 · contract | 0x0a6ebe…90119e | 2.50% |
| #4 · contract | 0xcc0c58…bd5cc5 | 2.26% |
| #5 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 1.25% |
This automated check scanned MarsCoin's contract code on BNB Chain and found a score of 13 out of 18. In practical terms, a 3% tax is applied on both buys and sells when trading through Flap's launch pool on PancakeSwap V2 — this rate was fixed at launch and the contract contains no function to change it, so on the date of this check there was no mechanism for the owner to raise it later or switch it off. Trades routed through other pools aren't subject to this tax. No honeypot behaviour was detected: the transfer simulation showed the token can be sold. No admin minting function was found, meaning the owner could not create new tokens to dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so the owner could not freeze all transfers, and no blacklist function was found, so the owner could not block specific wallets from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, meaning its core logic can't be swapped out after deployment. Liquidity in the launch pool is 99.93% burned, which limits the ability to pull that liquidity out from under holders. One point of concentration to note: the top 10 wallets hold 68.6% of supply, which means a small number of holders could move the market significantly if they sold.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only — the code itself, as it exists on-chain right now. It says nothing about who is behind MarsCoin, whether the team has a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a working product or roadmap, or whether any marketing claims are accurate. A contract can score well on mechanics while still being tied to a project with no real activity behind it, undisclosed team control routed through other wallets, or misleading promotion. None of that is assessed here.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at a few things this check can't tell you: who holds those top wallets and whether any are linked to the deployer or to each other, what the SPCXB pairing token is and whether it carries its own risks, whether the project has any public team identity or audit beyond this automated scan, and what the actual trading volume and liquidity depth look like beyond the launch pool. Checking the deployer wallet's history and whether similar tokens have been launched from it can also be informative. This summary reflects conditions found on the date of the check only and may not hold going forward.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.