| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 57.1% | Holder distribution | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | Not in a pool yet — Flap bonding curve | Flap factory | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1873 | Token contract | 21 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xc084d1…ba135c |
| Current owner | 0xe2ce6a…5c9de0 — Flap launchpad contract — it can only move the token from the curve to its pool |
| Holders | 1,873 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Flap bonding curve — tokens not yet sold · contract | 0xe2ce6a…5c9de0 | 43.40% |
| #2 · contract | 0xe78868…bc5ff5 | 2.45% |
| #3 · contract | 0xccba4a…078474 | 1.61% |
| #4 · contract | 0xd17b49…f0842b | 1.58% |
| #5 | 0x0fd1ba…ae19ed | 1.51% |
This automated check scored this token 14 out of 18 on contract mechanics, and it's worth translating what that actually means in practice. A 3% tax applies on both buys and sells once the token trades in its launch pool, and this rate was fixed at launch with no function detected to change it — so, unlike many tax tokens, the owner does not appear to retain the ability to raise this tax later. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the ability to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders was not found. Transfers are not pausable and no blacklist function was detected, so the ability to freeze a wallet or block a specific address from trading was not found either. The contract is not upgradeable via proxy, meaning its core logic cannot be swapped out after the fact. Selling was tested and found to work (not a honeypot) in simulation on the date of this check.
There are two points that deserve attention on their own. First, top-10 wallets hold 57.1% of supply, but 40.87% of total supply sits in Flap's bonding curve itself — unsold tokens, not a holder's wallet — so that concentration figure is partly mechanical rather than a sign of one party holding a large personal stake. Second, this token has not yet graduated to a PancakeSwap pool; it is still trading on Flap's bonding curve, so there is no locked liquidity to assess yet. Flap's design burns the LP tokens at graduation, which is a mechanism worth verifying independently once that happens, rather than assumed in advance.
None of this assesses who is behind the project, what the token is meant to do, how its economics are structured, or whether any marketing claims made about it are accurate. A contract can score well on mechanics and still be attached to a team with no track record, concentrated insider holdings, or claims that don't hold up to scrutiny. This check reads code behaviour only; it says nothing about intent.
Before putting any money toward this, it's worth looking at who holds the top wallets and whether any are linked to the deployer, searching for the project name and contract address for independent discussion outside its own channels, confirming independently that LP tokens are actually burned once the pool is created, and treating any guarantees of returns — "托底" implies a floor or backstop — as claims to verify rather than facts, since no contract mechanic can enforce a price floor on its own.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.