FLORK On-Chain Risk Check

FLORK · BSC · 0xf40592daacb3e5abf358789f5688c0b4f64d7777
15 / 18 On-chain Check
Checked 24 Oct 2026. On-chain Check, 18 of the 100-point ChainSift Score — what it covers.

Evidence

Risk factorFindingEvidenceDate
Sellable Yes Transfer simulation 24 Oct 2026
Buy tax 3% Flap token code 24 Oct 2026
Sell tax 3% Flap token code 24 Oct 2026
Admin mint Not present Contract 24 Oct 2026
Transfers pausable Not present Contract 24 Oct 2026
Address blacklist Not present Contract 24 Oct 2026
Upgradeable proxy No Contract 24 Oct 2026
Source verified Yes Block explorer 24 Oct 2026
Top-10 holders 43.8% Holder distribution 24 Oct 2026
Liquidity locked 99.99% burned LP holders · Flap launch pool 24 Oct 2026
Holders 7679 Token contract 24 Oct 2026

This contract — FLORK

Deployed by0x51389f…cb6ab7
Current ownerNone — ownership renounced
Holders7,679

Largest holders

RankAddressShare
#1 · contract 0x73d8bd…4946db 24.83%
#2 · Flap launch pool (PancakeSwap V2, paired with BTCB) · contract 0x9793a9…a8dcee 4.43%
#3 0x498208…6e89cb 2.79%
#4 · contract 0xddeb5d…b09881 2.67%
#5 · contract 0x9da5a1…0160d3 2.43%

What this means

This automated check of FLORK on BNB Chain found no honeypot behaviour, no admin mint function, no transfer-pausing function, no address blacklist capability, and no upgradeable proxy pattern — meaning the contract owner cannot currently mint new tokens at will, freeze specific wallets, pause trading, or swap in new contract logic after the fact. A transfer tax of 3% was detected on both buys and sells, charged only when trading through the token's original launch pool on PancakeSwap V2; the evidence indicates this rate was fixed at launch with no function to alter it and no built-in expiry, so it appears structurally permanent at this level rather than adjustable by the owner later. Liquidity in that launch pool was found to be 99.99% burned, which on the date of this check reduces (though does not eliminate) the risk of that specific pool's liquidity being pulled. Top-10 wallets were found to hold 43.8% of total supply, which is a concentration level that can allow a small number of holders to influence price materially if they sell.

It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract code and on-chain data only — it does not assess who the team behind FLORK is, whether they have a track record, how the tokenomics are structured beyond what's on-chain, whether any legal entity stands behind the project, or what the team's intentions are. No human has reviewed this token or its promotional material; the findings above come entirely from automated analysis of contract mechanics and current holder/liquidity data at the time of the check. A high score here reflects the absence of certain detected contract-level red flags on this date — it is not a statement that the token is safe, legitimate, or a good investment, and findings can change if the contract, liquidity, or holder base changes after this check was run.

Before putting money into this or any token, it's worth looking beyond contract mechanics: search for the team's identity and public history, read whatever documentation or whitepaper exists and check it against what the contract actually does, look at how supply is distributed beyond the top 10 holders, check whether liquidity exists in pools other than the one analysed here, and see whether the project has any independent coverage or community discussion outside its own channels. Since this token was found to be sellable with no honeypot behaviour detected, none of this changes the general caution that applies to any crypto purchase — only put in what you can afford to lose, and treat any on-chain check, including this one, as one input among several rather than a final answer.

Team, tokenomics and legal structure are not assessed here — that is the other 82 points of the ChainSift Score. How this check works and what it misses.

Watch this contract

Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.

We send one confirmation message and nothing else until something changes.

We checked 18 points out of 100.

The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.

Related guides

Contract data read from GoPlus Security and the BSC block explorer. Scores are calculated by fixed rules from that data — no language model decides them. Last updated 24 Oct 2026. A check describes a contract on the date shown; contracts can be changed afterwards.