| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 2% | Flap token code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 2% | Flap token code | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 44.3% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% burned | LP holders · Flap launch pool | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 223 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x6eafda…660464 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 223 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · Flap launch pool (PancakeSwap V2, paired with BNCB) · contract | 0xca7d9b…3ecc6e | 27.87% |
| #2 | 0x8b3658…2fb946 | 2.24% |
| #3 · contract | 0xf70a82…d01203 | 2.18% |
| #4 | 0xf9b78b…9f3902 | 1.96% |
| #5 | 0xe935e7…181603 | 1.88% |
This automated check scanned AIBO's contract code on BNB Smart Chain and found an on-chain score of 15 out of 18. In practical terms: the contract was found to be sellable in simulation, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected at the time of the check. A transfer tax of up to 2% applies on buys and sells — this was set at launch through Flap's token code and, as of this check, there is no function allowing the owner to change it or extend it, so it does not currently give the contract owner a lever to raise fees later. No admin mint function was found, meaning the supply cannot be inflated by the deployer as the contract is currently written. No pause function was found, so the contract does not currently give anyone the ability to freeze transfers. No blacklist function was found, meaning no address-level blocking capability was detected. The contract is not upgradeable, so its logic cannot be swapped out after deployment. Liquidity in the launch pool is reported as 100% burned, which means those LP tokens cannot be withdrawn by whoever controlled them. Top-10 wallets hold 44.3% of supply, which is a concentration level worth weighing, since large holders moving at once can affect the market for anyone else holding the token.
What this check does not tell you is just as important. It only reads contract mechanics as deployed — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how the token's economics are designed to play out over time, whether any marketing claims are accurate, or whether there is a legal entity standing behind it. A clean mechanical read does not speak to intent, and a token can pass every one of these technical checks while still carrying risks this type of scan is not built to catch, such as coordinated sell-offs by large holders or misleading promotion.
Before putting money in, it's worth looking at a few concrete things this check did not cover: who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, whether the project has published any audit beyond automated scanning, how long the liquidity pool has existed and its actual trading volume, where the team is identified (if at all) and whether they have any public history, and what independent community discussion says about the project. Checking holder growth and transaction history over time on a block explorer can also give a sense of whether activity looks organic. None of this replaces your own judgement, and this page does not constitute financial advice.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.