| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | ChainSift simulation | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 1% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 1% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 44.7% | Holder distribution | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 99.1% burned | LP holders | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 814 | Token contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xcd33b2…028b64 |
| Holders | 814 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 24.31% |
| #2 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x4b9acf…3b28e0 | 10.67% |
| #3 | 0xde701d…d87176 | 2.69% |
| #4 | 0xc2bb5c…eac402 | 1.59% |
| #5 · contract | 0xbf004b…ed4903 | 1.01% |
This automated check scored ROBO 4 out of 10 on contract mechanics alone. A few things are worth translating into plain terms. The contract applies a transfer tax of up to 1% on buys and sells, which is deducted automatically from each trade. More significantly, the owner retains the ability to mint new tokens at will, meaning the circulating supply could be increased at any time, which can dilute existing holdings. The contract also supports blacklisting specific addresses, which would let the owner block particular wallets from transacting with the token. On the date of this check, a simulated sell went through successfully, so no honeypot behaviour (a setup that lets you buy but blocks selling) was detected. The contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, meaning the analysis of mint and blacklist functions comes from reading raw bytecode rather than human-readable code, which carries more uncertainty than a verified contract would. Liquidity is reported as 99.1% burned, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of the liquidity pool being pulled by whoever controls it.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract code and on-chain data only — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team has a track record, how tokens are allocated or vested, whether there's a working product, or whether any marketing claims are accurate. A contract can score well on mechanics and still be attached to a project with weak fundamentals or undisclosed intentions, and conversely a flagged feature like mint authority doesn't by itself mean misuse will occur. This tool cannot assess intent, and no human has reviewed this specific token; the results come from an automated scan.
Before putting money in, it would be sensible to look at who holds the top wallets (44.7% held by the top 10 addresses is a concentration level worth sitting with, since large holders selling at once can move price sharply), to look for a verified source contract on the block explorer or request one from the project, to check whether the mint and blacklist functions are restricted by a timelock or multisig rather than a single wallet, and to look for independent information about the team, roadmap and any audit reports. Checking whether the liquidity lock or burn can be independently verified on-chain, rather than taken on trust, is also a reasonable step. None of this check's findings should be read as a recommendation either way.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.