| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1496 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xb60373…d0aaaa |
| Current owner | 0xb60373…d0aaaa |
| Holders | 1,496 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xb60373…d0aaaa | 99.98% |
| #2 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x1d50c7…659b0f | 0.01% |
| #3 | 0xae7036…8e4123 | 0.00% |
| #4 | 0xd59afc…83a2e0 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0xd12cd4…ed9fa7 | 0.00% |
This automated check scanned HYPER (Hyper Cove) on BSC on the date of the check and returned a score of 11 out of 18. A few things stand out that are worth understanding plainly. The contract includes a blacklist function, which means whoever controls it has the technical ability to block specific wallet addresses from transferring or selling the token, effectively freezing those holders out at will. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the ability to create new tokens out of thin air was not found in the contract as read. Transfers were not found to be pausable, and the contract is not upgradeable, so the logic in place today cannot be swapped for different logic later through a proxy mechanism. The contract source code is verified on the block explorer, which allows this kind of automated reading in the first place, and a transfer simulation found the token sellable, meaning no honeypot behaviour was detected at the time of the check. However, liquidity is not locked, which means whoever supplies the trading pool can withdraw it without a time restriction, and the top 10 wallets hold 100% of the supply, an extremely concentrated distribution where a small number of holders control the entire circulating amount.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract code and on-chain data only — it does not know who the team behind Hyper Cove is, whether they have a track record, what their stated plans or tokenomics are, whether any legal entity stands behind the project, or what their intentions are. No human has reviewed this project, and no judgement is made here about whether it is trustworthy, promising, or otherwise. A clean read on contract mechanics says nothing about whether the people controlling the blacklist function or the liquidity pool will act in holders' interests.
Before putting any money toward this token, it would be worth looking into who the deployer wallet is and whether it has a history of similar launches, checking whether the liquidity pool tokens are held by a known locker contract or sit in a personal wallet, reviewing the project's own communications about tokenomics and vesting, and searching independently for any public discussion of the team or prior complaints. Given that 100% of supply sits with ten wallets and liquidity can be pulled at any time, the concentration and liquidity findings here are the kind of detail that deserves scrutiny beyond what any automated scan can tell you.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.