| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No data | Transfer simulation | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 49.2% | Holder distribution | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 0.2% burned | LP holders | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 95 | Token contract | 31 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xe1b4e6…f4b5ab |
| Holders | 95 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xe1b4e6…f4b5ab | 48.54% |
| #2 | 0xf56dcd…d12b29 | 0.11% |
| #3 | 0xf4a6b1…636db9 | 0.09% |
| #4 | 0xcab82b…e7f693 | 0.09% |
| #5 | 0xc9d222…3601cd | 0.08% |
This automated check returned a score of 4 out of 10 for HTT PROTOCOL on BSC, and the most important thing to understand is how little could actually be verified. The contract's source code is not verified on the block explorer, which means the check could only examine raw bytecode rather than readable, confirmed logic. As a result, critical functions — whether the token can be sold, whether there are hidden buy or sell taxes, whether the owner can mint new tokens, pause transfers, or blacklist specific wallets — all returned no data. This is not the same as these risks being absent; it means the automated system could not confirm one way or the other on the date of this check. Separately, the top 10 wallet addresses hold 49.2% of the total supply, a concentration level that means a small number of holders could sell in a way that affects the price significantly, and only 0.2% of liquidity has been burned, meaning the vast majority of the trading pool is not locked in a way this check could confirm as permanent.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is a purely mechanical read of contract code and on-chain data — it says nothing about who is behind the project, their track record, their intentions, or whether their roadmap and marketing claims hold up. It does not assess tokenomics design, legal structure, jurisdiction, or whether any team member can be identified or contacted. No human has reviewed this contract or project; the entire result above was generated automatically and reflects only what public on-chain data sources returned at the time of the request.
Given that core safety mechanics (sellability, taxes, mint and pause functions) could not be confirmed at all, and the source code itself is unverified, there is a meaningful gap in what is currently known about this contract's behaviour. Before going further, it would be worth checking whether the contract has been verified on the block explorer since this check was run, looking directly at holder distribution and LP lock details on a block explorer or dedicated LP-lock tracker, and searching for any independent audits or community discussion addressing the unverified source specifically. Because sellability could not be confirmed, any decision to interact with this contract carries a layer of uncertainty that this check alone cannot resolve.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 10 points out of 100.
The other 90 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.