| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0.1% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 5.1% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 32.4% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% until 7 Sept 2029 (earliest of 7 locks) | LP holders · PinkLock02 | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 701 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x36907d…9dca08 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 701 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x45aab5…3206e5 | 8.46% |
| #2 | 0x04366d…641637 | 3.13% |
| #3 · contract | 0xead98d…5aefdb | 2.92% |
| #4 | 0x9f112d…1477aa | 2.74% |
| #5 | 0x2f957c…bc97b0 | 2.63% |
This automated check looked at WiCat's contract code and current on-chain data, and scored 16 out of 18. In practice, that means a transfer simulation found the token sellable, with no honeypot behaviour detected on the date of the check. A buy tax of 0.1% and a sell tax of up to 5.1% were found in the contract — this means a portion of each trade is automatically diverted, typically to the project's own wallets, rather than going to you or the counterparty. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the owner does not appear able to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No ability to pause transfers or blacklist addresses was found, which means the contract does not currently give the owner a way to freeze your wallet or block it from trading. The contract is not upgradeable, so its logic cannot be swapped out later without deploying an entirely new contract. Liquidity is reported as 100% locked across seven locks, with the earliest unlocking in September 2029 — this reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of liquidity being pulled by whoever controls those locked positions. Top-10 wallets hold 32.4% of supply, which is a concentration level worth factoring in, since large holders moving in or out can affect price and liquidity depth.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics and on-chain state only — things that can be verified mechanically, like tax rates, mint functions, and lock contracts. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team's identity is genuine, how the token's economics are designed to play out over time, what legal entity (if any) stands behind it, or whether there is any intent to mislead holders through means that don't show up in the code itself, such as coordinated promotion or off-chain agreements. A high score here reflects the absence of certain detectable contract-level risks, not an endorsement of the project.
Before putting money into this or any token, consider looking into who the team is and whether they're identifiable, reading or seeking independent review of the contract beyond this automated check, checking whether the liquidity lock provider (PinkLock02 here) and the locked amount can be independently verified on-chain, reviewing the distribution of the top holders in more detail to see if any look like team or exchange wallets, and researching the project's stated purpose and community activity through independent sources rather than the project's own channels alone.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.