| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1541 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x2d6eca…d4777a |
| Current owner | 0x2d6eca…d4777a |
| Holders | 1,541 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0x2d6eca…d4777a | 99.99% |
| #2 | 0xae7036…8e4123 | 0.00% |
| #3 | 0xd59afc…83a2e0 | 0.00% |
| #4 | 0x143c48…07e9c8 | 0.00% |
| #5 | 0xfd176e…e59c0d | 0.00% |
This automated check of the ASD (Asteroid) contract on BSC returned a score of 11 out of 18, based on contract mechanics only. A few findings are worth translating into plain terms. The contract includes a blacklist function, which means whoever controls it retains the ability to block specific wallet addresses from transacting with the token, including selling it, at any point in the future. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the ability to create new tokens out of thin air was not found in the contract as read. Transfers were not found to be pausable, and the contract is not upgradeable via proxy, meaning its core logic cannot be swapped out after deployment. A test transfer simulation found the token sellable at the time of the check, and no honeypot behaviour was detected on that date. Buy tax reads 0%, though sell tax data was unavailable, so the actual cost of exiting a position could not be confirmed. Two findings stand out as higher risk: the top 10 wallets hold 100% of the supply, meaning a very small number of holders could move the market significantly if they sold, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it at any time, which can sharply reduce or eliminate the ability to sell at a reasonable price.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data, not a review by a person, and not an assessment of the team behind the token, their intentions, the project's tokenomics, roadmap, marketing claims, or any legal status. A verified source and a clean set of contract-level findings say nothing about whether the people controlling the contract or the liquidity pool intend to act in holders' interests.
Given the combination of unlocked liquidity and extreme holder concentration, anyone considering this token may want to look further before deciding anything. Concretely: check the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who holds the LP tokens and whether they're locked or have a withdrawal history; look at the wallet addresses behind the top 10 holders to see whether they're linked, newly created, or already moving funds; search for the project's social channels and any independent discussion of the team's identity and track record; and check whether the contract owner address still has active privileges (like the blacklist function) rather than having renounced ownership. None of this replaces independent judgement, and this check does not constitute financial advice.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.