| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 11% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 9.2% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Enabled | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 74.8% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 92% burned | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 10242 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x4f0cef…ca975b |
| Current owner | 0x4f0cef…ca975b |
| Holders | 10,242 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0xd34485…af0e9d | 60.60% |
| #2 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 7.04% |
| #3 | 0x0cc0c5…f9b588 | 2.62% |
| #4 | 0xa488f4…7e5fc7 | 0.99% |
| #5 | 0x282c9d…71d9ea | 0.82% |
This automated check scored WEBFOUR 8 out of 18 on contract mechanics alone. A few things stand out. The contract charges a transfer tax of up to 11%, meaning every time tokens are bought or sold a cut is taken, which eats into returns regardless of price movement. The contract also allows the owner to pause transfers entirely, which means holders could, at the owner's discretion, be temporarily unable to move or sell their tokens. On top of that, the contract supports blacklisting specific addresses, which would let the owner block individual wallets from transacting. None of these behaviours were triggered during this check — a test transfer simulation showed the token was sellable at the time of testing — but the capability to pause transfers and blacklist addresses exists in the code and could be used at any point by whoever controls the contract. Holder concentration is also high, with the top 10 wallets holding 74.8% of total supply, meaning a small number of holders could influence the market by moving large amounts at once. On the more reassuring side, no admin minting function was found, the contract is not an upgradeable proxy, the source code is verified on the block explorer, and 92% of liquidity has been burned, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the risk of liquidity being pulled.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not do. It reads only the mechanics written into the smart contract — what the code technically allows the owner to do. It says nothing about who the team behind WEBFOUR is, whether their stated plans or roadmap are credible, how the token's supply and incentives are structured long-term, or whether there is any legal entity standing behind the project. A contract can look clean on paper while still being tied to a team with no track record, and conversely, mechanics like pausing or blacklisting exist in many legitimate projects for reasons such as regulatory compliance or security response. This check cannot tell you intent.
Before putting money in, it would be worth looking into who operates the project and whether they're identifiable, checking community channels and any independent discussion of the token for red flags, reviewing whether the owner's pause and blacklist privileges are explained anywhere officially, and confirming current liquidity and holder data directly on the block explorer, since on-chain conditions can change after this check was run.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.