| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 80% | Holder distribution | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 1344 | Token contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x80a6ca…6516b5 |
| Holders | 1,344 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 50.02% |
| #2 | 0x80a6ca…6516b5 | 13.30% |
| #3 | 0x330b2c…e07165 | 5.00% |
| #4 | 0xa26cad…7e74d3 | 2.51% |
| #5 | 0xd3dc77…cc3806 | 2.11% |
This automated check scored BABY 0 out of 18, and the most important finding is that a simulated sale could not be completed: the contract blocked the transaction. In practice, this means that even though buying the token may go through without issue, converting it back to BNB or another asset is not currently possible through normal means. On top of that, the contract allows the owner to mint new tokens at will, which means the supply backing each holder's share can be increased at any time without their consent. Source code for the contract is not verified, so this assessment is based on reading the raw bytecode rather than human-readable logic, which limits how much can be confirmed about other mechanics. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, and the top 10 wallet addresses hold 80% of all tokens, a concentration that gives a small number of holders outsized influence over the token's trading behaviour.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only — no person has reviewed this token, and nothing here speaks to who is behind the project, what their intentions are, how the token is meant to be used, or whether any marketing claims made about it are accurate. Tokenomics design, team identity, roadmap credibility and legal structure sit entirely outside the scope of this check. A low score reflects contract-level risk indicators detected on the date of this check; it is not a judgement on the people or plans behind BABY.
Given that selling is currently blocked, this is a situation where no amount of money put into the token, however small, can presently be taken back out. For that reason, a test purchase is not a way to verify anything here — if the sell restriction holds, test funds would be stuck the same as any other funds. Anyone wanting to look further into this project without committing funds could review the contract's public transaction history for prior sell attempts by other wallets, check the liquidity pool address directly to see who controls it, and look for any official statements from the project team addressing the mint function and the lack of verified source code. Running this same check again later may also show whether conditions have changed, since findings reflect only the moment they were captured.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.