| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | Transfer simulation | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not found | Implementation code | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not found | Implementation code | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not found | Implementation code | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | Yes — a single wallet can replace the code | Proxy contract | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 10718109 | Token contract | 22 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x3d2504…6acd7d |
| Code can be replaced by | 0x3d2504…6acd7d — a single wallet |
| Current code | 0x0dfc95…1e30a7 |
| Holders | 10,718,109 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x0051ef…0841b3 | 65.10% |
| #2 | 0xf61f56…7d926c | 24.65% |
| #3 | 0xcdbdc0…3eba8d | 7.53% |
| #4 | 0x99d7d5…9912f6 | 6.35% |
| #5 | 0x123456…e99fb4 | 6.27% |
This automated check gave BOOM a score of 0 out of 12, and the reason is the most serious one this tool can flag: a transfer simulation found that selling is blocked by the contract. In practice, this means that while buying the token may go through, attempting to sell it does not — the contract code itself prevents the transaction from completing. Once this is detected, the overall score is set to 0 regardless of any other findings, because no other factor matters if the exit is closed. Separately, the contract uses an upgradeable proxy pattern, which means a single wallet holds the power to replace the underlying contract code at any time — including code governing minting, pausing, blacklisting, or selling — even if none of those specific behaviours are present in the current version. Liquidity is also not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it. The source code being verified on the block explorer is a positive signal for transparency (it means the code is readable), but it does not offset the sell block or the upgrade risk.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not do. It reads contract mechanics only — it does not assess who the team behind BOOM is, whether their intentions are good or bad, how the tokenomics are structured, whether there is a legal entity behind the project, or what any marketing claims are worth. This is an automated scan of code behaviour, not a human review, and it cannot speak to intent, reputation, or future actions by the people controlling the contract or the proxy admin wallet.
Given that selling has been detected as blocked, no amount of money put into this token — including a small test purchase — can currently be retrieved through a normal sell transaction, since the block applies to all sell attempts, not just large ones. If you want to investigate further regardless, you could look up the proxy admin address on the block explorer to see its transaction history, check whether the liquidity pool tokens are held by a known locking contract or by an individual wallet, and search for any public statements from the project about the sell restriction. None of this changes what the automated findings already show about current contract behaviour on the date of this check.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 12 points out of 100.
The other 88 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.