| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — the sell tax takes the whole sale | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | 100% | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 100% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 15 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xcc79f3…78099e |
| Holders | 15 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xcc79f3…78099e | 65.77% |
| #2 | 0x071c65…8d39f4 | 10.10% |
| #3 | 0x895935…67940b | 8.31% |
| #4 | 0x09f79d…dbbf86 | 6.07% |
| #5 | 0x98aa6a…61bcd2 | 5.36% |
This automated check ran a simulated buy and sell against the BOHAL contract and found that selling is currently blocked: the contract's sell tax is set to 100%, meaning any attempt to sell returns effectively nothing to the holder. This is what's known as honeypot behaviour. Alongside this, the contract includes a blacklisting function, which means whoever controls it can block specific wallet addresses from transacting at all. Source code for the contract has not been verified on the block explorer, so the check could only examine compiled bytecode rather than readable code, limiting how much could be confirmed about other functions. Liquidity in the trading pool is not locked, meaning it could be withdrawn by whoever controls it, and the top 10 holders currently hold 100% of the supply across only 15 known holders, indicating very high concentration. Together, these findings place the contract at 0 out of 18 on this check's scale, and because selling is blocked, that score cannot be offset by any other result.
It's important to be clear about what this check does and doesn't do. It reads the contract's mechanics as they exist on-chain on the date of the check — things like tax settings, transfer restrictions, and holder distribution. It does not assess who is behind the project, their intentions, any roadmap or marketing claims, legal structure, or whether tokenomics make sense as an investment. A contract can show no flags here and still carry risks this check cannot see, and conversely, flags here do not establish intent — only capability. No human has reviewed this token; the findings come entirely from automated analysis.
Given that selling is currently blocked, no amount of money put into this token — including a small test purchase — would be retrievable while that condition holds, so no purchase, of any size, is a way to "check" this further. If you want to look deeper into the project itself, you could examine the contract deployer's wallet history and other tokens they've launched, look for any official team communication or social presence tied to the project, and check the liquidity pool directly on-chain to confirm who holds and controls it. Independently verifying contract source code, if it's ever published, through a trusted explorer is also worth doing. None of this changes what the automated findings already show about current sell behaviour, concentration, and liquidity control.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.