| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 78.4% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 46% burned, the lock on 53.7% ended 30 Nov 2024 | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1959874 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xf103d2…062b74 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 1,959,874 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 51.76% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 6.67% |
| #3 · contract | 0xeaed59…6a6b8d | 4.40% |
| #4 | 0x63a3d2…6b2687 | 3.37% |
| #5 | 0x4cad1e…a81f17 | 3.17% |
This automated check scanned the BabyDoge contract on BSC and returned a score of 13 out of 18. In practical terms, the simulation found the token sellable, with buy and sell tax both set to 0% at the time of the check. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens out of thin air and dilute holders. No pause function was detected, so the owner does not currently have a built-in way to freeze transfers. No blacklist function was detected, meaning there is no on-contract mechanism found that would let an address be blocked from trading. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, so its logic cannot be swapped out after the fact through that route, and the source code is verified on the block explorer, which means the published code can be read and checked against what is deployed. On liquidity, 46% of the LP has been burned, which is generally treated as a stronger signal than a timed lock, while the lock covering the remaining 53.7% ended on 30 November 2024 — once a lock expires, whoever controls that LP is free to withdraw it, so this is worth noting rather than assuming it's still secured. Holder concentration is high: the top 10 wallets hold 78.4% of supply, which means large sales by a small number of addresses could move the market materially.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics only — the functions written into the code and what a transfer simulation shows on the date of the check. It says nothing about the team behind the token, whether they are identifiable or anonymous, how tokenomics are actually distributed or vested over time, any legal structure or registration, marketing practices, or intent. A contract can score well on mechanics and still carry risks this check cannot see, and conditions like tax rates, locks, or ownership can change after this check was run.
Before putting money in, it would be worth independently verifying the current status of that expired LP lock — checking whether the liquidity is still sitting in the pool or has been moved — looking at the distribution and history of the top 10 wallets to see if they are exchange addresses or linked wallets, checking whether contract ownership has been renounced or transferred, and looking for independent information about the team and project history outside of the contract itself.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.