| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 92.9% | Holder distribution | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 14785 | Token contract | 29 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x8f15b3…ca0350 |
| Current owner | 0xb5bc24…cfc432 |
| Holders | 14,785 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xc882b1…84f071 | 29.03% |
| #2 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 17.19% |
| #3 | 0xeab472…3eb33f | 12.70% |
| #4 · contract | 0x73d8bd…4946db | 11.48% |
| #5 | 0x82d0ff…7a68dc | 8.64% |
This automated check scored CNPY 10 out of 18 on contract mechanics. A transfer simulation found the token sellable on the date of the check, with no buy or sell tax detected and no pause or blacklist function present in the code. However, several findings are worth understanding in practical terms. The contract includes an admin mint function, which means whoever holds the owner privileges can create new tokens at will — this can dilute existing holders' share of supply without warning. Liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, which would make it difficult or impossible for holders to sell at a fair price, or at all. Top-10 wallets hold 92.9% of supply, a high concentration that means a small number of holders could move the market significantly if they sold. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows this kind of automated reading of its functions in the first place, though verification alone does not reduce the risks above.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract code and on-chain data only, done at a single point in time. It says nothing about who the team behind CNPY is, whether they have a track record, how tokens were allocated before launch, what their stated plans are, or whether any legal structure or registration exists around the project. No human has reviewed this project's intent, communications, or roadmap. A contract can look mechanically unremarkable while still being attached to a team or marketing effort that carries its own separate risks.
Before putting money into CNPY, it would be worth independently verifying who controls the owner wallet and whether mint and liquidity-withdrawal privileges have been renounced or are held by a multisig with public signers. Checking the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see whether it's locked via a reputable locker service, and for how long, would also be useful. Looking at the holder list to see whether the top wallets are exchanges, known project wallets, or unexplained individual addresses can help put the 92.9% concentration figure in context. Searching for independent discussion of the project outside its own channels, and checking whether contract ownership has been renounced on-chain, are also reasonable next steps before deciding how to proceed.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.