| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Enabled | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Balances | Changeable — whoever controls the contract can take tokens from any wallet | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 87.8% | Holder distribution | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 13807 | Token contract | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x2ba7ed…54e3fc |
| Current owner | 0x9d0698…055915 |
| Holders | 13,807 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xa39945…14b71c | 39.78% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 29.72% |
| #3 | 0x8894e0…e2d4e3 | 4.40% |
| #4 | 0xb0a3a2…7e4411 | 3.51% |
| #5 | 0x4cad1e…a81f17 | 2.84% |
This automated check scanned ACEToken (ACE) on BNB Chain and returned a score of 9 out of 18. Several of the findings relate directly to what the contract owner can do to holders, so it is worth translating them plainly. The contract allows admin minting, meaning whoever controls it can create new tokens at will, which can dilute the value of tokens already held by others. The balances in this contract are changeable, which means the controlling address has the technical ability to alter or remove tokens from any wallet directly, not just through normal transfers. Liquidity is not locked, so whoever supplies the trading pool could withdraw it at any time, which can leave buyers unable to trade at a meaningful price even though selling itself is not blocked. On the positive side, no honeypot behaviour was detected in this check — the sell simulation went through, and both buy and sell tax were recorded at 0% on the date of testing. Transfers were not found to be pausable and no address blacklist function was detected. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, which allows this kind of automated reading in the first place. Holder concentration is high: the top 10 wallets hold 88% of supply, which means large holders have outsized influence over price if they choose to sell.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is a mechanical read of the contract's code and on-chain state as it stood at the time of the scan — nothing more. It says nothing about who the team behind ACE actually is, whether they have a track record, how the tokenomics are structured beyond what is on-chain, whether any legal entity stands behind the project, or what the team's intentions are. A verified source and a clean tax reading do not indicate endorsement, trustworthiness, or future conduct — an owner with minting and balance-changing rights can alter the economics of the token at any time, regardless of current settings.
Given these findings, concrete next steps would include looking for independent confirmation of who holds the contract's admin keys and whether those keys sit behind a multisig or timelock, checking whether the project has published any audit from a named firm, verifying the liquidity pool address and its lock status directly on a block explorer rather than relying on team claims, and reviewing the distribution and vesting of the top-10 holder wallets. None of this check's findings should be read as advice to buy, hold, or avoid the token.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.