| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 47.3% | Holder distribution | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 69505 | Token contract | 7 Sept 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x6af3f5…ff679e |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 69,505 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x73d8bd…4946db | 30.39% |
| #2 | 0xc882b1…84f071 | 4.94% |
| #3 | 0x0d0707…b492fe | 3.35% |
| #4 | 0x696d12…9d8e28 | 1.69% |
| #5 | 0x012152…6ced57 | 1.35% |
This automated check on 牛来 (牛来) examined the contract's code and current on-chain state on BSC, and returned a score of 16 out of 18. In practical terms, the scan found that a test transfer was sellable, buy and sell tax are both set to 0%, and no admin minting function, transfer-pausing switch, address blacklist, or upgradeable proxy pattern was detected in the contract at the time of the check. This means that, based on what the code allows today, the contract owner does not appear to hold the ability to mint new tokens at will, freeze wallets, pause trading, or route funds through an upgraded contract logic. The source code is also verified on the block explorer, meaning the code humans can read matches what is actually deployed, which supports the reliability of this analysis. Two points stand out as risk indicators rather than red flags in themselves: the top 10 holders control 47.3% of supply, which is a meaningful concentration that could allow coordinated selling to affect price, and liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it without a time-lock preventing them from doing so.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team is anonymous or doxxed, how tokenomics are structured beyond what's on-chain, whether any legal entity stands behind the token, or what the stated intentions of the creators are. No flags being present does not mean a project is safe, legitimate, or free of risk — it means those specific behaviours were not detected in the contract as of the date of this check. Contracts can also be changed, supplemented with new contracts, or have liquidity withdrawn after this check was run.
Before considering any transaction, it would be worth looking at who holds the top wallets and whether any are known exchange or team addresses, checking the liquidity pool directly on a tool like BscScan to see how much is there and who controls the LP tokens, searching for any public information about the team or project roadmap, and checking whether the contract has been flagged elsewhere or has a history of ownership changes. Reviewing recent transaction activity for unusual patterns and confirming holder count trends over time may also add useful context that this check does not provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.