| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 88.3% | Holder distribution | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 5998 | Token contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xa74763…396690 |
| Holders | 5,998 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · contract | 0xec1559…69f193 | 71.64% |
| #2 · contract | 0xa509be…d3c407 | 15.00% |
| #3 · contract | 0x1e8503…87b53d | 1.21% |
| #4 · Uniswap v4 pool · contract | 0x28e2ea…e9e9df | 0.17% |
| #5 | 0x897578…bbfb32 | 0.14% |
This automated check scanned the SAFU contract on BNB Chain and scored it 13 out of 18. In plain terms, a simulated transfer showed the token can currently be sold, and buy and sell taxes are both set to 0%, so no mechanism was detected that would trap funds or quietly skim value on every trade. No admin minting function was found, meaning the contract owner does not appear able to create new tokens and dilute holders at will. No pause function or address blacklist was detected either, which would otherwise let an owner freeze transfers generally or block specific wallets from moving their own tokens. The contract is not upgradeable, so its current rules cannot later be swapped out via a proxy. That said, two points pulled the score down: the top 10 wallets hold 88.3% of the entire supply, which is a high concentration — if any of those holders sell in size, it can move the price sharply and there is little that smaller holders can do about it. Liquidity is also not locked, meaning whoever controls the liquidity pool could withdraw it, which would make the token difficult or impossible to sell on the open market even though no sell restriction exists in the code itself.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics as they exist today — it does not assess who is behind the project, whether the team is anonymous, how the tokenomics are structured long-term, whether any legal entity stands behind it, or what the stated intentions of the developers are. No human has reviewed this token, and a clean mechanical read does not speak to the people or plans behind it. Findings also reflect only the date of this check; contract permissions, holder balances and liquidity status can all change afterward.
Before considering any transaction, it would be reasonable to look at the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer or DEX tracker to see who holds the LP tokens and whether a lock or vesting schedule exists outside the contract itself. It's also worth checking whether the top holders are known entities (exchanges, burn addresses, team wallets) or unidentified wallets, since concentration risk means something different depending on who's holding. Reviewing the project's own communications, any audit reports, and the history of the liquidity pool's size and stability over time would also add useful context that this contract-level check cannot provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.