Before you buy: Liquidity is not locked. Who can pull it out, how much real money is in the pool, and what do you lose selling $1,000?
| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 98.5% | Holder distribution | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 64 | Token contract | 2 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xacae4d…9e82fb |
| Holders | 64 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xe84ee4…067c9d | 14.29% |
| #2 | 0x084287…c09942 | 12.95% |
| #3 | 0xee000c…224a9f | 12.84% |
| #4 | 0x0ec0f5…c04d3d | 12.32% |
| #5 | 0xacae4d…9e82fb | 12.20% |
This automated check looked at V12's contract code and current on-chain state, and scored 12 out of 18. A sell simulation completed without detecting honeypot behaviour, meaning the contract did not block a sale on the date of the check, and the buy tax reads as 0%. No admin minting function, transfer-pausing function, address blacklist, or upgradeable proxy pattern was detected in the contract code, which means the functions commonly used to freeze holders, dilute supply at will, or swap in new logic after launch were not found. The source code is verified on the block explorer, so what's deployed can be read by anyone. Two things pull the score down and deserve real attention: liquidity is not locked, which means whoever controls the liquidity pool can withdraw it at any time, and the top 10 holders control 98.5% of the total supply across only 64 holders in total — an extremely concentrated distribution where a small number of wallets could move the market significantly if they sell. Sell tax data was not available, so the actual cost of exiting a position isn't confirmed.
This check only reads contract mechanics and current holder/liquidity data. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team's wallets are among those top 10 holders, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there's a working product, legal structure, jurisdiction, or intent. A clean mechanical read and an unlocked, concentrated supply can coexist — the absence of a coded backdoor doesn't mean coordinated selling or a liquidity withdrawal can't happen through ordinary wallet actions that aren't flagged by this kind of check.
Before putting money in, it would be worth looking up whether the deployer or team wallets appear among the top holders, checking the liquidity pool directly on the block explorer to see who holds the LP tokens and whether any lock exists elsewhere than what was detected, reviewing the project's own communications about token allocation and vesting, and searching independently for any audits, community discussion, or history tied to this contract or team. Given the liquidity is unlocked and holdings are this concentrated, understanding exactly who can move that liquidity or that supply is the most load-bearing piece of information this check could not give you.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.