| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 88% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 89% | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 75.7% | Holder distribution | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 100% burned | LP holders | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 3246 | Token contract | 27 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x99a1fd…1c2cb3 |
| Current owner | 0x99a1fd…1c2cb3 |
| Holders | 3,246 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x72231e…73a8bb | 64.26% |
| #2 | 0xda1ead…20ccf6 | 3.69% |
| #3 | 0x34cac0…1f44f5 | 2.00% |
| #4 | 0x0aecf0…b15696 | 1.08% |
| #5 | 0xed31cf…c3b937 | 1.01% |
This automated check scanned BabyADA's contract code on BSC and scored it 7 out of 18. The most significant finding is a transfer tax of up to 89%, applied on both buying and selling. In practice, this means that for every unit of value sent into or out of this token, the contract can redirect the vast majority of it elsewhere before it reaches the intended wallet — a holder attempting to sell could receive only a small fraction of the expected proceeds. The contract also supports blacklisting, meaning the owner retains the ability to block specific addresses from transacting with the token at all, at their discretion. Separately, the top 10 holders control 75.7% of the supply, so a small number of wallets have outsized influence over price movements if they choose to buy or sell in size. On the positive side, no honeypot behaviour was detected — the transfer simulation indicates selling is technically possible — the contract source is verified on the block explorer, and the liquidity pool shows as 100% burned as of the check date, meaning that portion cannot be withdrawn by a single party. No admin mint function or pausable transfers were detected, and the contract is not upgradeable.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — it has not been reviewed by a person, and it says nothing about who is behind the project, how the token's economics are designed to play out over time, whether any legal entity stands behind it, or what the team's intentions are. A verified source and burned liquidity reduce certain technical risks but do not speak to the extreme tax structure already identified, which functions independently of liquidity or source code transparency.
Given the tax levels found here, it would not be appropriate to suggest testing the waters with a small purchase: even a modest amount put into a token with an 88–89% buy/sell tax will likely lose most of its value immediately upon the transaction itself, regardless of what happens afterward. Before considering any further action, it would be worth independently verifying the tax figures directly against the live contract on the block explorer, reviewing the wallet addresses holding the top 10 positions to understand concentration risk, researching who controls the contract's owner/admin functions and whether blacklisting powers have been exercised historically, and looking for any independent commentary or audits of this specific contract address rather than relying on the project's own claims.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.