| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | No data | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Balances | Changeable — whoever controls the contract can take tokens from any wallet | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 49.5% | Holder distribution | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | 99.6%, end date unknown | LP holders · Mudra | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 17422 | Token contract | 25 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x705428…366af5 |
| Current owner | 0x705428…366af5 |
| Holders | 17,422 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · PancakeV2 · contract | 0x5d250d…a66250 | 16.75% |
| #2 · contract | 0x6e70b2…ae9b83 | 6.75% |
| #3 · contract | 0xa00186…52b9bf | 5.31% |
| #4 | 0x3995f0…1733f6 | 5.13% |
| #5 | 0x8e69aa…569dfa | 4.61% |
This automated check scored ENH 13 out of 18. A transfer simulation found that selling was possible on the date of the check, and no admin mint function or pausable transfer mechanism was detected, meaning the contract owner cannot currently create new tokens out of thin air or freeze trading outright. However, two findings are worth translating plainly. First, the contract includes blacklisting functionality, which means whoever controls it can block a specific wallet address from transacting, including selling. Second, and more significantly, the contract allows balances to be changed directly — this means the controlling party has a built-in mechanism to alter how many tokens a wallet holds, which in practice could be used to remove tokens from a holder's balance without that holder's action. Neither of these capabilities being present means they're automatically used, but their presence means the technical ability exists at the contract level. Liquidity is reported as 99.6% locked, though the lock's end date is not available, so it is not possible to confirm how long that lock holds. Top-10 wallets control 49.5% of supply, which is a concentration level worth factoring into any view of how the token might behave if large holders move at once.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's code and on-chain data only, checked at a single point in time. It says nothing about who the team behind ENHANCE is, whether their identities are known or anonymous, how the tokenomics are structured beyond raw holder percentages, whether any legal entity stands behind the project, or what the team's intentions are. No human has reviewed this project, and a clean reading of contract mechanics does not speak to conduct, marketing claims, or future decisions by whoever holds admin control.
Before putting money into ENH, it's worth looking at who holds the admin/owner wallet and whether it's a multisig or a single key, checking whether the liquidity lock can be verified independently with an actual unlock date, reviewing the project's own communications and any audit reports from named third parties, and looking at how the top holders' tokens were acquired and whether they're subject to any vesting. Searching the contract address and team names for prior history or community discussion is also a reasonable next step before deciding anything.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.