| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 99.9% | Holder distribution | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 3352 | Token contract | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x76cb40…6f0d88 |
| Holders | 3,352 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x76cb40…6f0d88 | 99.70% |
| #2 | 0x2b1c56…866e9f | 0.21% |
| #3 | 0xdb8945…c7ed0a | 0.01% |
| #4 | 0xc72675…219db2 | 0.01% |
| #5 | 0x180c0b…39397b | 0.01% |
This automated check found that CAL's contract blocks selling: an automated simulation attempted to sell the token and the transaction did not go through. In practical terms, this means tokens can currently be bought but not resold through normal means — any money put into this token would stay in it, with no ability to exit through a sale. The contract also supports blacklisting, which means whoever controls it has the technical ability to block specific wallet addresses from transacting, even if that function is not currently in use. Top-10 wallets hold 99.9% of supply, meaning a very small number of holders could move or sell most of the circulating tokens if they chose to, which could affect anyone else holding the token. Liquidity is not locked, so whoever provided the trading pool could withdraw it at any time. The contract's source code is also unverified, meaning it is not possible to read the actual logic behind these functions — this check is based on analysing the compiled bytecode rather than human-readable code, which limits how much can be confirmed.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at what the code technically allows, not at who is behind the project, what they intend to do, or whether they plan to do it. It does not assess the team's identity or track record, the token's economic design, marketing claims, roadmap, or any legal structure around the project. A contract can have clean mechanics and still be part of a project with poor fundamentals or misleading claims, and conversely, flagged mechanics don't necessarily mean harmful intent — but they do represent capabilities that exist in the code as it stands on the date of this check.
Given that selling is currently blocked, this is not a situation where testing with a small purchase would provide useful information — any funds sent in would be subject to the same inability to sell. Before considering any further action, it would be worth independently verifying the contract source code on a block explorer if it becomes available, checking whether the project team has made any public statement about the sell restriction, and reviewing the liquidity pool and top holder wallets directly on-chain to see recent activity. Consulting independent, qualified sources beyond this automated check is advisable given the number and severity of findings here.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.