| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Address blacklist | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 5.4% | Holder distribution | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Holders | 381 | Token contract | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xc85cb0…3ba59a |
| Holders | 381 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0xc0a031…09b6d2 | 0.54% |
| #2 | 0x2e5792…eb9df5 | 0.54% |
| #3 | 0xa9ef0b…0e92c6 | 0.54% |
| #4 | 0xbca5c8…0a7d95 | 0.54% |
| #5 | 0x8ba862…cc0929 | 0.54% |
This contract scored 0 out of 18, and the reason is decisive: an automated simulation found that selling CLOSE is blocked. In practice, this means that wallets which hold the token cannot convert it back out, regardless of how promising the chart or community activity might look. A buy transaction appears to succeed, but the sell path fails — a pattern commonly called a honeypot. No other finding on this page can offset that result, because the ability to exit a position is the most basic function a token needs to have.
The other flags describe additional ways a contract's design can give its owner or deployer control over holders, even though on this token several of them show "no data" because the source code is unverified. Liquidity not being locked means whoever supplied the trading pool can remove it at will, draining the pair that lets people trade. Unverified source means the contract's actual logic cannot be read in plain code, only inspected as compiled bytecode, which limits how much automated tools — or anyone — can confirm about mint functions, pausability, or blacklist controls. Top-10 holders controlling 5.4% of supply is, taken on its own, a relatively low concentration figure, but it carries little weight given that funds cannot currently be withdrawn at all.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. This is a mechanical read of the contract and its on-chain data as they existed at the time of the scan — it does not assess who the team behind CLOSE is, whether their stated goals or roadmap are credible, how the token's supply or incentives are structured, or whether any legal entity stands behind the project. No human reviewed this contract; the findings come from automated analysis of bytecode behaviour and holder data, and they can change if the contract is upgraded, if liquidity conditions shift, or if new data becomes available.
Given that selling is currently blocked, this is not a case where a small test purchase would clarify anything — money placed into a token that cannot be sold remains stuck regardless of the amount. Anyone researching this token further might look at the deployer wallet's history on BscScan, check whether the project has published verified source code elsewhere, look for independent confirmation of team identity, and treat any marketing claims separately from these on-chain mechanics. None of this constitutes investment advice, and no outcome — positive or negative — is guaranteed by this or any other automated check.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.