| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 11% | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 83.7% | Holder distribution | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 13524 | Token contract | 26 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x6b33ef…c5cfe8 |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 13,524 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · burned | 0x000000…00dead | 53.64% |
| #2 | 0x77215a…5196f2 | 16.41% |
| #3 | 0xc7029e…570171 | 3.56% |
| #4 | 0x124d9b…44f012 | 3.43% |
| #5 | 0x719be0…41c368 | 1.72% |
This automated check of MARSINU on BSC scored 10 out of 18, and a few things are worth translating into plain terms. A transfer tax of up to 11% means that on top of normal trading fees, a cut of each transaction can be redirected elsewhere, which reduces the amount that actually reaches a buyer or seller and can be changed by the contract owner within the limits coded into the contract. Top-10 wallets holding 83.7% of supply means a small number of addresses could sell large amounts at once, which can move the price sharply regardless of what any individual holder decides to do. Liquidity not being locked means whoever controls that liquidity pool is free to withdraw it at any time, which would make it difficult or impossible to sell the token on that exchange pool. On the positive side, no admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, no blacklist capability and no upgradeable proxy were detected as of the date of this check, and a sell simulation did not detect honeypot behaviour — meaning a test transaction was able to both buy and sell at the time it was run. The contract's source code is also verified on the block explorer, which allows anyone to read the underlying code directly.
It's important to be clear about what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of the contract's mechanics only — it does not assess who is behind the project, what their intentions are, how the token's economics are designed to play out over time, whether any marketing claims are accurate, or whether any legal or regulatory structure exists around it. No person has reviewed this token, and a clean mechanical reading does not speak to the judgement, conduct or future actions of the people controlling it.
Before putting any money toward this token, it would be worth independently verifying who controls the liquidity pool and the contract's owner address, checking whether that owner wallet is a multisig or a single key, looking at the actual transaction history of the top holders to see if they've moved tokens before, and searching for any independent commentary or audits of the project outside of this tool. Given the unlocked liquidity and high holder concentration found here, those particular points deserve close attention. Where sell tax data is missing, as it is here, treat that as an open question rather than an assumption of zero tax, and confirm the real cost of a sale directly on-chain or via a simulator before relying on it.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.