| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | No — transfers blocked | ChainSift simulation | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | No data | Contract | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | No data | Contract | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | No data | Contract | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Enabled | Contract bytecode | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No data | Contract | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | No | Block explorer | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 99.9% | Holder distribution | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 6157 | Token contract | 17 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0x487077…569510 |
| Holders | 6,157 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x487077…569510 | 79.08% |
| #2 | 0xf97781…41acec | 6.11% |
| #3 | 0xf89d7b…5eaa40 | 4.90% |
| #4 | 0x635308…7553d9 | 3.00% |
| #5 | 0x3b5a23…23b32d | 2.50% |
This automated check on INT (Intmax) on BSC returned a score of 0 out of 18, and the findings point to serious structural risk indicators that were detected in the contract on the date of this check. The most significant is honeypot behaviour: ChainSift's simulation found that selling is blocked by the contract, meaning holders can buy the token but may not be able to sell it back for other assets. The contract also supports blacklisting addresses, which would let whoever controls it prevent specific wallets from transacting at all. On top of this, the top 10 holders control 99.9% of the supply, so a very small number of wallets — potentially including the project team or deployer — hold the overwhelming majority of tokens and could affect the market significantly if they moved them. The contract source code is not verified, meaning no one can read a human-readable version of what the contract actually does; only raw bytecode is available, which limits independent scrutiny. Finally, liquidity is not locked, so whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it at any time, which could leave buyers holding a token with no functioning market.
It's important to understand what this check does not cover. This is an automated read of contract mechanics only — it looks at code behaviour, holder distribution and liquidity status. It says nothing about who is behind the project, their intentions, their track record, the token's economic design, whether any entity has legal accountability, or whether marketing claims made elsewhere are accurate. No human has reviewed this project, and the absence of a specific flag only means that particular behaviour was not detected at the time of the check — it is not a guarantee that the behaviour doesn't exist or won't be added later.
Before considering any transaction involving this token, it would be worth independently verifying several things: whether the contract source code can be obtained and reviewed elsewhere, whether there is any public documentation identifying the team and their history, whether the liquidity pool details can be confirmed directly on-chain through a block explorer, and whether other holders have reported being able to sell successfully. Given that selling was blocked in this simulation and liquidity is unlocked, anyone considering an interaction with this contract should treat the inability to exit a position as a live possibility rather than a remote one, and should weigh that carefully against any amount they are considering committing.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.