| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 91.8% | Holder distribution | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Holders | 31307 | Token contract | 3 Sept 2026 |
This automated check on BMT (Bubblemaps, BSC) scored 12 out of 18, based on contract mechanics only, as of the date of the check. A transfer simulation found the token sellable, with a 0% buy tax and 0% sell tax detected in the contract code. No admin mint function was detected, meaning the contract as read does not appear to let the owner create new tokens out of thin air. No transfer-pausing function and no address blacklist function were detected, so nothing in the code as reviewed suggests the owner can freeze the contract or block specific wallets from moving their tokens. The contract is not an upgradeable proxy, which means its logic cannot be swapped out for different code after deployment. The contract source is verified on the block explorer, so the code that was analysed matches what is publicly viewable. Two points stand out as risk indicators: liquidity is not locked, meaning whoever supplied the trading pool could withdraw it, and the top 10 holders control 91.8% of supply, a concentration level where a small number of wallets could move the market by selling.
It is important to be clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics — the code's functions and behaviours — and nothing more. It says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team's identity is known or verifiable, how tokens were allocated or vested, whether there are off-chain agreements, marketing claims, or legal obligations tied to the token, or what the people running it intend to do next. A clean set of contract findings does not speak to any of that, and a token can pass every mechanical check here while still carrying risks that live entirely outside the contract.
Before putting money into this or any token, it's worth looking directly at where the liquidity sits and whether it's genuinely locked or held by a multisig, checking who the top holder wallets are and whether they're linked to exchanges, team allocations, or unrelated large investors, and looking at the liquidity pool's history for prior withdrawals. It's also worth researching the team's public track record, reading any available audit reports in full rather than just the summary, and checking community discussion for firsthand reports of problems trading or withdrawing. This page reflects an automated read of the contract only; it does not substitute for that broader research, and it does not constitute investment advice.
Contracts change after they are checked. Leave an email or a Telegram chat ID and we will tell you the moment this one does — taxes raised, minting switched on, liquidity unlocked. Free for three contracts, no account and no password.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.