| Risk factor | Finding | Evidence | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellable | Yes | Transfer simulation | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Buy tax | 0% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Sell tax | 0% | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Admin mint | Not present | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Transfers pausable | Not present | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Address blacklist | Not present | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Upgradeable proxy | No | Contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Source verified | Yes | Block explorer | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Top-10 holders | 98.2% | Holder distribution | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Liquidity locked | No | LP holders | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Holders | 1128260 | Token contract | 30 Oct 2026 |
| Deployed by | 0xfc79c6…953c0b |
| Current owner | None — ownership renounced |
| Holders | 1,128,260 |
| Rank | Address | Share |
|---|---|---|
| #1 · UniswapV3 · contract | 0x251313…075503 | 80.82% |
| #2 | 0xd67545…b29632 | 16.77% |
| #3 | 0xf108a0…80f56d | 0.25% |
| #4 | 0x7adeb3…45883d | 0.06% |
| #5 | 0x2dc24f…ef0e9c | 0.06% |
This automated check scanned XGirl's contract code and current on-chain data and returned a score of 12 out of 18. On the date of the check, no honeypot behaviour was detected: a transfer simulation indicated the token can be sold, and both the buy and sell tax read as 0%. No admin mint function, no transfer-pausing mechanism, no address blacklist capability, and no upgradeable proxy pattern were found in the contract — meaning that, as it stands, the owner does not appear to hold the technical means to block sales, freeze wallets, mint new tokens out of thin air, or swap out the contract logic later. The contract source is also verified on the block explorer, so the code behind these findings is publicly readable rather than hidden. Set against that, two findings stand out as risk indicators: the top 10 holders control 98.2% of the total supply, and the liquidity backing the token is not locked. Concentrated holdings mean a small number of wallets could sell large amounts at once, and unlocked liquidity means whoever controls it is free to withdraw it from the trading pool at any time, which can leave remaining holders unable to sell at a meaningful price even without any "sellable: no" flag being triggered.
It's worth being clear about what this check does not cover. It reads contract mechanics and on-chain holder data only — it says nothing about who is behind the project, whether the team's identity is known or verifiable, how the tokenomics are designed to play out over time, whether any legal entity stands behind the token, or what the people controlling it actually intend to do with their holdings or liquidity position. A clean set of contract-level findings does not speak to any of that, and conversely, concentrated holdings or unlocked liquidity don't by themselves prove bad intent — they're simply conditions that increase certain risks.
Before putting money into XGirl, it would be worth looking at who holds the top wallets and whether they're known contract addresses (like exchanges or staking contracts) rather than individual holders, checking the liquidity pool directly on a block explorer to see who holds the LP tokens and whether any lock exists elsewhere that this check didn't pick up, searching for any public information about the team or project history, and reviewing recent transaction activity for signs of large wallets moving funds. None of this guarantees an outcome either way — it simply gives a fuller picture than contract mechanics alone can provide.
Contracts change after they are checked. Tell us where to reach you and we will say when this one does. Free for three contracts, no account.
We checked 18 points out of 100.
The other 82 are where money is usually lost: who the team is, where the tokens sit, what the documents actually say, and what the project chose not to put on its front page.
Trading a meme coin? The meme coin check shows how much real money is in the pool and what you lose selling $1,000, who can pull that money out, who holds the supply and how it trades — ready within 3 minutes of payment, day or night.